Neurodynamic and Communication Analysis of Healthcare Teams During Simulation Debriefings

Objective: To determine whether a dynamical analysis of neural and communication data streams provide fine-grained insights into healthcare team debriefings. Background: Debriefing plays a key role in experiential learning activities such as healthcare simulation because it bolsters the transfer of experience into learning through a process of reflection. There have been few studies examining the neural and communication dynamics of teams as team members are supported by trained facilitators in making better sense of their performance. Method: Electroencephalographic (EEG)–derived brain waves and speech were recorded from experienced and medical student healthcare teams during post-simulation debriefings. Quantitative estimates of the neurodynamic organizations of individual team members and the team were modeled from the EEG data streams at different scalp locations and at frequencies from 1-40 Hz. In parallel the dynamics of speech turn taking were quantified by recurrence frequency analysis. Results: Neurodynamic organizations were preferentially detected from sensors over the parietal lobes with activities present in the alpha, beta and gamma frequency bands. Rhythmic structures emerged as correlations between speech, discussion blocks and team & team member neurodynamic organizations. Conclusion: Organizational representations help reveal the neurodynamic, communication, and cognitive structures of debriefing. Application: The quantitative neurodynamic and communication measures will allow direct comparisons of debriefing structures across teams and debriefing protocols.

[1]  Aaron D. Wyner,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1993 .

[2]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Toward a quantitative description of the neurodynamic organizations of teams , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[3]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Healthcare Teams Neurodynamically Reorganize When Resolving Uncertainty , 2016, Entropy.

[4]  L. Parra,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Correlated Components of Ongoing Eeg Point to Emotionally Laden Attention – a Possible Marker of Engagement? , 2022 .

[5]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  The organizational neurodynamics of teams. , 2013, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[6]  Jenny W Rudolph,et al.  Establishing a Safe Container for Learning in Simulation: The Role of the Presimulation Briefing , 2014, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[7]  C. Finney,et al.  A review of symbolic analysis of experimental data , 2003 .

[8]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Dynamical analysis in real time: detecting perturbations to team communication , 2012, Ergonomics.

[9]  Peter Dieckmann,et al.  The Relationship Between Facilitators’ Questions and the Level of Reflection in Postsimulation Debriefing , 2013, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[10]  S. Bowe,et al.  Facilitation and Debriefing in Simulation Education. , 2017, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[11]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[12]  Adam Cheng,et al.  Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): Development and Rationale for a Blended Approach to Health Care Simulation Debriefing , 2015, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[13]  David M. Gaba,et al.  The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning , 2007, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[14]  K. Shockley,et al.  Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[16]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Demonstration of a Method for Real-time Detection of Anomalies in Team Communication , 2017 .

[17]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork? , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[18]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[19]  Y. Paulignan,et al.  Neural correlates of non-verbal social interactions: A dual-EEG study , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Shad Deering,et al.  Adaptation of the US Army’s After-Action Review for Simulation Debriefing in Healthcare , 2013, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[21]  Scott I. Tannenbaum,et al.  Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Melanie J. Martin,et al.  Cross-Level Effects Between Neurophysiology and Communication During Team Training , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Ronald H. Stevens,et al.  Modeling the neurodynamic organizations and interactions of teams , 2016, Social neuroscience.

[24]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .

[25]  R. Ward,et al.  Robust Common Spatial Patterns for EEG signal preprocessing , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[26]  T. Dornan,et al.  Experiential learning: Transforming theory into practice , 2012, Medical teacher.

[27]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: The dual attentional processes hypothesis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.