Two types of possessive forms in English

Abstract In this paper we distinguish between the two instances of word-final -s characterizing English possessive forms: (i) the pronominal final -s of hi s and (ii) the full-DP final -s of Mary’ s . We argue that the pronouns are morphologically complex, consisting of a nominative pronoun ( he , you ) and the endings -s or -r , which correspond to the copular forms is and are ( he’ s , you’ re ). As such, they are not real possessive markers, but rather, sg./pl. copulas, which together with the nominative pronoun yield a possessive pronominal form ( hi s , you r ). We adopt the idea that the agreement between pronoun and copula is triggered in a spec-head configuration in a DP-internal agreement projection [E. Ritter, Nat. Lang. Linguist. Theory 13 (1995) 405; R.-M. Dechaine, M. Wiltschko, Linguist. Inq. 33.3 (2002) 409]. We further argue, in line with Kayne [Stud. Linguist. 47.1 (1993) 3] (and in contrast with den Dikken [M. den Dikken, (Anti-)agreement in DP, in: R. van Bezooijen, R. Kager (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1998, p. 95; On the structural representation of possession and agreement: the case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases, in: I. Kenesi (Ed.), Crossing Boundaries: Advances in the Theory of Central and Eastern European Languages, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 1999, p. 137], that the -s of Mary’ s book and a book of Mary’ s is not a copula, but rather a (singular) number marker akin to that found in the verbal domain ( she eat s ). Plural possessive DPs ( the kids’ mother ), according to our analysis, are plural DPs ( the kids ) further marked with a null plural number morpheme ‘o’ ( the kids ’ o mother ). We claim that this is the same as the (null) plural morpheme found in the verbal domain ( she eat s vs. they eat o ).

[1]  Anna Szabolcsi.  THE POSSESSOR THAT RAN AWAY FROM HOME , 1983 .

[2]  W. Labov.  Contraction, Deletion, and Inherent Variability of the English Copula. , 1969 .

[3]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  Toward a cartography of subject positions , 2004 .

[4]  Richard S. Kayne.  TOWARD A MODULAR THEORY OF AUXILIARY SELECTION , 1993 .

[5]  Igor Mel’čuk,et al.  Aspects Of The Theory Of Morphology , 2006 .

[6]  Lars-Olof Delsing,et al.  Possession in Germanic , 1998 .

[7]  Guiseppe Longobardi,et al.  Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-movement in Syntax and , 1994 .

[8]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  The possessive construction in Hungarian: A configurational category in a non-configurational language , 1981 .

[9]  A. Radford,et al.  Case, Agreement and EPP: Evidence from an English-speaking child , 2001 .

[10]  I. Kenesei,et al.  Crossing boundaries : advances in the theory of Central and Eastern European languages , 1999 .

[11]  Elizabeth Ritter,et al.  On the syntactic category of pronouns and agreement , 1995 .

[12]  M. D. Dikken,et al.  On the Structural Representation of Possession and Agreement: the Case of (Anti-)agreement in Hungarian Possessed Nominal Phrases , 1999 .

[13]  Lars-Olof Delsing,et al.  The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages , 1993 .

[14]  Joseph Wright,et al.  The English dialect dictionary , 1898 .

[15]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  Suppressing the Zs , 1987, Journal of Linguistics.

[16]  Giuseppe Longobardi,et al.  Proper names and the theory of N-movement in Syntax and logical form , 1991 .

[17]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Restricting Suffix Combinations In German And English: Closing Suffixes And The Monosuffix Constraint , 2002 .

[18]  Anna Cardinaletti,et al.  On the deficient/strong Opposition in Possessive Systems , 1998 .

[19]  C. Barker,et al.  Partitives, Double Genitives and Anti-Uniqueness , 1998 .

[20]  Appalachian Speech, by Walt Wolfram and Donna Christian. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1976 , 1978 .

[21]  Radford,et al.  转换生成语法教程 = Transformational Grammar , 2000 .

[22]  Martina Wiltschko,et al.  Decomposing Pronouns , 2002, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  C. Allen.  The development of ‘strengthened’ possessive pronouns in English , 2002 .

[24]  Alain Rouveret.  FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES AND AGREEMENT , 1991 .

[25]  Steven Abney,et al.  The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect , 1972 .

[26]  Artemis Alexiadou,et al.  Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase , 1998 .

[27]  Anne Zribi-Hertz,et al.  On the dual nature of the ‘possessive’ marker in Modern English , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[28]  M. Dikken.  (Anti-)Agreement in DP , 1998 .