A composite framework for co-optimization of spacecraft trajectory and propulsion system

Abstract Indirect optimization methods convert optimal control problems (OCPs) into two- or multi-point boundary-value problems. A highly desirable feature of indirect methods, specifically for space applications, is that high-resolution trajectories can be generated, which satisfy the first-order necessary conditions of optimality. A recently developed Composite Smoothing Control (CSC) framework is utilized to formulate and solve the problem of simultaneous trajectory optimization and propulsion sub-system design of spacecraft. A reasonable parameterized breakdown of the spacecraft mass is adopted, which captures the impact of power produced by the solar arrays and its contribution to the total spacecraft mass. Thus, the implicit trade-offs can be considered in the indirect optimization approach. The function space co-optimization problem of spacecraft power subsystem parameters along with the main trajectory is solved with the objective to maximize the payload delivered. The proposed framework amounts to an invariant embedding that reduces the original, difficult-to-solve, multi-point boundary-value problem into a two-point boundary-value problem with continuous, differentiable control inputs. Utility of the proposed construct is demonstrated through a low-thrust, multi-revolution, multi-year rendezvous maneuver to asteroid Dionysus with a variable-specific-impulse, variable-thrust modeled engine. This is the first time that indirect optimization methods have tackled such a complex co-optimization problem using the CSC framework.

[1]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Application and Analysis of Bounded-Impulse Trajectory Models with Analytic Gradients , 2018, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[2]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  Dawn: A mission in development for exploration of main belt asteroids Vesta and Ceres , 2006 .

[3]  John L. Junkins,et al.  How Many Impulses Redux , 2019, The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences.

[4]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  MISSION DESIGN FOR DEEP SPACE 1 : A LOW-THRUST TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION MISSION , 1999 .

[5]  Di Wu,et al.  Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2020 .

[6]  Zhaokui Wang,et al.  Double-homotopy technique for fuel optimization of power-limited interplanetary trajectories , 2019, Astrophysics and Space Science.

[7]  I. Kolmanovsky,et al.  Enhanced Smoothing Technique for Indirect Optimization of Minimum-Fuel Low-Thrust Trajectories , 2016 .

[8]  R. Epenoy,et al.  New smoothing techniques for solving bang–bang optimal control problems—numerical results and statistical interpretation , 2002 .

[9]  Lorenzo Casalino,et al.  Optimization of Variable-Specific-Impulse Interplanetary Trajectories , 2002 .

[10]  John L. Junkins,et al.  Generic Smoothing for Optimal Bang-Off-Bang Spacecraft Maneuvers , 2018, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[11]  Steven N. Williams,et al.  Mars Missions Using Solar Electric Propulsion , 2000 .

[12]  Jean Albert Kechichian,et al.  Optimal low-thrust transfer using variable bounded thrust☆☆☆ , 1995 .

[13]  A novel approach for optimal trajectory design with multiple operation modes of propulsion system, part 2 , 2019 .

[14]  M. J. Walker A set of modified equinoctial orbit elements , 1985 .

[15]  Xun Pan,et al.  Practical Homotopy Methods for Finding the Best Minimum-Fuel Transfer in the Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem , 2020, IEEE Access.

[16]  M. J. Walker,et al.  A set modified equinoctial orbit elements , 1985 .

[17]  Thomas Haberkorn,et al.  Low thrust minimum-fuel orbital transfer: a homotopic approach , 2004 .

[18]  V. G. Petukhov,et al.  Joint Optimization of the Trajectory and the Main Parameters of an Electric Propulsion System , 2017 .

[19]  John L. Junkins,et al.  Exploration of Alternative State Vector Choices for Low-Thrust Trajectory Optimization , 2019, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[20]  Ilya Kolmanovsky,et al.  A Novel Approach for Optimal Trajectory Design with Multiple Operation Modes of Propulsion System, Part 1 , 2019, Acta Astronautica.

[21]  Alessandro Antonio Quarta,et al.  Fuel-optimal, power-limited rendezvous with variable thruster efficiency , 2005 .