Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design, Validity, and Reliability in Construction Research

The fact that people play key roles in nearly all aspects of construction suggests that effective construction research requires proper application of social science research methods. This is particularly true for researchers studying topics that involve human actions or behavior in construction processes, such as leadership, innovation, and planning. In social science research, no single method of data collection survey, experiment, participant observation, or unobtrusive research is ideal. Each method has inherent strengths and weak- nesses. Careful attention to the methodological ABCs of the design process, as discussed here, can enhance the validity and reliability of a given study. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in research design and data collection, however, should be considered whenever possible. Such mixed-methods research is more expensive than a single method approach, in terms of time, money, and energy, but improves the validity and reliability of the resulting data and strengthens causal inferences by providing the opportunity to observe data convergence or divergence in hypothesis testing. DOI: 10.1061/ASCECO.1943-7862.0000026 CE Database subject headings: Research; Methodology; Measurement; Data analysis; Construction management. Author keywords: Research methods; Mixed methods; Social science; Concept measurement; Data analysis.

[1]  Martin Loosemore,et al.  International construction management research: cultural sensitivity in methodological design , 1999 .

[2]  J. Rooke,et al.  The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate , 1997 .

[3]  Goran Runeson,et al.  The role of theory in construction management research: comment , 1997 .

[4]  John Raftery,et al.  Breaking up methodological monopolies: a multi-paradigm approach to construction management research , 1997 .

[5]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .

[6]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Choosing an appropriate research methodology , 1997 .

[7]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  John Raftery,et al.  Price stability and the business cycle: UK construction bidding patterns 1970-91 , 1997 .

[9]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[10]  W. Paul Vogt,et al.  Quantitative research methods for professionals , 2006 .

[11]  Amm Liu,et al.  Research Methods for Construction (3rd ed.) , 2008 .

[12]  C Loehlin John,et al.  Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis , 1986 .

[13]  Simon Washington,et al.  Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential , 2000 .

[14]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[15]  A. Hunter,et al.  Multimethod Research: A Synthesis of Styles , 1989 .

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[17]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1962 .

[18]  Tamer E. El-Diraby,et al.  Lessons Learned in Designing Research Methodology in Field-Based Construction Research , 2004 .

[19]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .