Impact of “Better than Nyquist” pulse shaping in GFDM PHY with LTE-compatible frame structure

The shifting towards New Radio waveforms for future cellular networks will require a smooth transition from the existing 4G physical layer (PHY), which is based on the LongTerm Evolution-Advance (LTE-A) system. This will allow the service provider to develop less cost multi-standard devices that rely on the same master clock compatibility and with the same time-frequency grid representation of the LTE-A. The main characteristic of generalized frequency-division multiplexing (GFDM) modulation is low out-of-band (OOB) emission, accomplished by using flexible pulse shape filtering in the timedomain of individual subcarriers. In this paper, first we focus on the integration of GFDM in the time-frequency grid of the LTE-A system and then we analyze the impact of “Better than Nyquist” pulse shaping filters on OOB emission and symbol error rate. We consider different “Better than Nyquist” pulse shaping filters that were originally introduced in single-carrier modulation schemes to reduce the sensitivity to symbol timing error. By using the results available in the literature, the performance achieved by “Better than Nyquist” pulse shaping filters is compared to that achieved by conventional Nyquist ones. The concept of the wavelet, based on the Meyer auxiliary function, along with pulse shaping filter will be also addressed. The results are presented for 16-QAM in the case of transmission over AWGN, time-varying frequency flat, and static frequency selective fading channels. Monte Carlo simulations are shown in order to validate the accuracy of the analytical expressions.

[1]  Xi Zhang,et al.  On the Waveform for 5G , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Sonia Aïssa,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Cognitive Radio Based IEEE 802.22 Wireless Regional Area Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Yongsheng Ding,et al.  An Intelligent Self-Organization Scheme for the Internet of Things , 2013, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[4]  Jeffrey C. Dill,et al.  The square root raised cosine wavelet and its relation to the Meyer functions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  LTE-compatible 5G PHY based on generalized frequency division multiplexing , 2014, 2014 11th International Symposium on Wireless Communications Systems (ISWCS).

[6]  Frank Schaich,et al.  5GNOW: non-orthogonal, asynchronous waveforms for future mobile applications , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Gerhard P. Fettweis,et al.  The Tactile Internet: Applications and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine.

[8]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  An investigation of transmission properties of Xia pulses , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[9]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Influence of pulse shaping on bit error rate performance and out of band radiation of Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[10]  Andrea M. Tonello,et al.  Improved Nyquist pulses , 2004, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  GFDM Interference Cancellation for Flexible Cognitive Radio PHY Design , 2012, 2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[12]  Ivan Simões Gaspar,et al.  Waveform Advancements and Synchronization Techniques for Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing , 2016 .

[13]  Atul Kumar,et al.  Improved Nyquist pulse shaping filters for generalized frequency division multiplexing , 2016, 2016 8th IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM).

[14]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  Generalized Frequency Division Multiplexing for 5th Generation Cellular Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Communications.