Risk Perception and Communication in International Maritime Shipping in Japan after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster

This paper investigated the contamination-related impact of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster in Japan on seaport activities and international maritime shipping. Risk perception and risk communication after the disaster were analyzed. The maritime-related newspaper articles published in Japan after this disaster were extensively reviewed. Eleven maritime-related agents, including port managers, governments, shipping companies, port operators, and shippers, were interviewed. These interviews were conducted from June to December 2011. The results of the interviews revealed that the contamination-related impact of the power plant disaster comprised impacts on (a) major Japanese ports, including Keihin ports, that were skipped (not called at) by 42 container vessels operated by non-Japanese shipping companies; (b) foreign ports and the measurement of radiation of Japanese cargo; and (c) actions taken by the Japanese government and port managers. The framework of social amplification of risk communication was used to explain the events observed after the disaster. Use of this framework suggests that the risk communication made by maritime stakeholders successfully reduced the amplification of risk among stakeholders at various levels of information sources, information channels, and stations. A summary of lessons from the study includes the identification of factors that influenced the amplification of risk, quick responses, and appropriate countermeasures by authorities and port managers, and the introduction of systematic radiation measurement under the international agreement.

[1]  Shigeo TAKAHASHI,et al.  Urgent Survey for 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami Disaster in Ports and Coasts-PartI(Tsunami) , 2011 .

[2]  P. Thijssen,et al.  Is Knowledge Important? Empirical Research on Nuclear Risk Communication in Two Countries , 2012, Health Physics.

[3]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Credibility and trust in risk communication , 1991 .

[5]  公男 細野 福島原発事故への対処法―データ、情報、知識の観点から , 2012 .

[6]  J. Masuda,et al.  Place, Culture, and the Social Amplification of Risk , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  C. D. de Freitas,et al.  Major chemical accidents in industrializing countries: the socio-political amplification of risk. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Tetsuzo Yasunari,et al.  Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jean-Pascal Assailly,et al.  The Psychology of Risk , 2012 .

[10]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  PortSec: A port security risk analysis and resource allocation system , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST).

[11]  Yoshio Takahashi,et al.  Land-Surface Contamination by Radionuclides from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident , 2012 .

[12]  Ph.D. Prof. S.I. Kubo M.D.,et al.  Great East Japan Earthquake , 2011, Rechtsmedizin.

[13]  T. Drabek Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings , 2011 .

[14]  Eugene A. Rosa,et al.  Desired Risk: Broadening the Social Amplification of Risk Framework1 , 1990 .

[15]  Toshimasa Ohara,et al.  Atmospheric behavior, deposition, and budget of radioactive materials from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March 2011 , 2011 .

[16]  E. Potchen Nuclear Power and the Public , 1971 .

[17]  P. Slovic The perception gap: Radiation and risk , 2012 .

[18]  H. Yonehara,et al.  PERCEIVED RISK OF NUCLEAR POWER AND OTHER RISKS DURING THE LAST 25 YEARS IN JAPAN , 2012, Health physics.

[19]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[20]  Hironori Kato,et al.  NEWSPAPER REPORTS ON EAST JAPAN GREAT EARTHQUAKE IN FOUR COUNTRIES , 2012 .

[21]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Global Risk Governance , 2008 .

[22]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[23]  F. Andritsos,et al.  Port security in EU: A systemic approach , 2010, 2010 International WaterSide Security Conference.

[24]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[25]  P Slovic,et al.  Assessment of the Regional Economic Impacts of Catastrophic Events: CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of an RDD Attack Scenario , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.