The Effects of Decision‐Aid Use and Reliability on Jurors' Evaluations of Auditor Liability

This study provides evidence on how auditors' use of decision aids affects jurors' evaluation of auditor legal liability, based on an experiment in which actual jurors responded to a hypothetical audit lawsuit. The results suggest that decision aids can have positive, negative, or neutral effects on auditors' legal liability, depending on how auditors use the decision aid and the reliability of the decision aid. For high‐reliability aids, jurors attributed more responsibility for an audit failure to the auditor when the auditor overrode the recommendation of a decision aid than when the auditor did not use the decision aid. However, jurors attributed lower responsibility to an auditor who relied on the recommendation of a highly reliable decision aid, even though the aid turned out to be incorrect. In contrast to the high‐reliability conditions, auditors' use of the decision aid had virtually no impact on jurors' liability judgments when the reliability of the decision aid was low.

[1]  Catherine Usoff,et al.  A longitudinal study of applicable decision aids for detailed tasks in a financial audit , 2001, Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag..

[2]  Kathryn Kadous.  The Effects of Audit Quality and Consequence Severity on Juror Evaluations of Auditor Responsibility for Plaintiff Losses , 2000 .

[3]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  A Decision Aid for Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting , 2000 .

[4]  David H. Sinason,et al.  Three's a crowd: An examination of state statutes and court decisions that narrow accountant liability to third parties for negligence , 2000 .

[5]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose.  Empirical research in auditor litigation : considerations and data , 2001 .

[6]  C. Lennox.  Audit Quality and Auditor Size: An Evaluation of Reputation and Deep Pockets Hypotheses , 1999 .

[7]  Stephen A. Hillegeist.  Financial reporting and auditing under alternative damage apportionment rules , 1999 .

[8]  Sarah E. Bonner,et al.  Fraud Type and Auditor Litigation: An Analysis of SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases , 1999 .

[9]  James R. Frederickson,et al.  Independent auditor litigation: Recent events and related research , 1998 .

[10]  J. A. Siliciano.  Trends in independent auditor liability: The emergence of a sane consensus? , 1997 .

[11]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose.  Audit litigation research: Do the merits matter? An assessment and directions for future research , 1997 .

[12]  Steven M. Glover,et al.  The Influence of Decision Aids on User Behavior: Implications for Knowledge Acquisition and Inappropriate Reliance , 1997 .

[13]  Mark F. Zimbelman.  The Effects of Sas No. 82 on Auditors' Attention to Fraud Risk Factors and Audit Planning Decisions , 1997 .

[14]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Reliance on Decision Aids: An Examination of Auditors' Assessment of Management Fraud , 1997 .

[15]  Buck K.W. Pei,et al.  The Effects of Decision Consequences on Auditors' Reliance on Decision Aids in Audit Planning☆☆☆ , 1997 .

[16]  J. Mancino,et al.  The Auditor and Fraud , 1997 .

[17]  Arnold M. Wright,et al.  Evaluation of Competing Hypotheses in Auditing , 1997 .

[18]  James R. Frederickson,et al.  Motivating factors in lawsuits against independent auditors: Experimental evidence on the importance of causality , 1996 .

[19]  Ronald R. King,et al.  The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: A Discussion of Three Provisions , 1996 .

[20]  S. Sutton,et al.  An Analysis of Potential Legal Liability Incurred Through Audit Expert Systems , 1995 .

[21]  Steven E. Kaplan,et al.  The effect of using diagnostic decision aids for analytical procedures on judges' liability judgments , 1995 .

[22]  William E Messier.  Judgment and decision-making research in accounting and auditing: Research in and development of audit-decisions aids , 1995 .

[23]  Jere R. Francis.  Auditing, hermeneutics, and subjectivity , 1994 .

[24]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients , 1994 .

[25]  R. Watts,et al.  Lawsuits Against Auditors , 1994 .

[26]  Ronald A. Dye,et al.  Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor Wealth , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  Dan C. Kneer,et al.  The Significance of Audit Decision Aids and Precase Jurists' Attitudes on Perceptions of Audit Firm Culpability and Liability* , 1993 .

[28]  Zoe-Vonna Palmrose,et al.  Trials Of Legal Disputes Involving Independent Auditors - Some Empirical-Evidence , 1991 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Shibano,et al.  Assessing Audit Risk From Errors And Irregularities , 1990 .

[30]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Pressure And Performance In Accounting Decision Settings - Paradoxical Effects Of Incentives, Feedback, And Justification , 1990 .

[31]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  Using and evaluating audit decision aids , 1988 .

[32]  H. Arkes,et al.  Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task , 1986 .

[33]  H. Kelley,et al.  Attribution theory and research. , 1980, Annual review of psychology.