NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control

This article analyzes effects and implications of New Public Management (NPM) when implemented in the civil service systems in New Zealand and Norway, focusing especially on the effects of devolution and contractualism on political control. Using a transformative perspective, we interpret these effects as a result of a melding of environmental factors, polity features and national historical-institutional constraints. Norway scores low on both environmental and internal factors enhancing administrative reform, furthering a soft version of NPM and small changes in political control. In contrast a combination of external pressure, weak countervailing cultural forces and ‘elective dictatorship’ in New Zealand produces a radical version of NPM, resulting in a weakening of central political control.

[1]  Nils Brunsson.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations , 1989 .

[2]  J. Nagel.  Social Choice in a Pluralitarian Democracy: The Politics of Market Liberalization in New Zealand , 1998, British Journal of Political Science.

[3]  Johan P. Olsen.  Organized Democracy: Political Institutions in a Welfare State-- the Case of Norway , 1983 .

[4]  A. Grimes,et al.  Economic Reform in New Zealand 1984-95: The Pursuit of Efficiency , 1996 .

[5]  John Martin.  Reorienting a Nation: Consultants and Australian Public Policy , 2018 .

[6]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[7]  R. Gregory.  Political Responsibility For Bureaucratic Incompetence: Tragedy At Cave Creek , 1998 .

[8]  Nils Brunsson.  The Organization Of Hypocrisy , 2002 .

[9]  A. Cheung.  Understanding public-sector reforms: global trends and diverse agendas , 1997 .

[10]  Per Lægreid,et al.  New Public Management: Design, Resistance, or Transformation? A Study of How Modern Reforms Are Received in a Civil Service System , 1999 .

[11]  F. Castles.  Big government in weak states: The paradox of state size in the english‐speaking nations of advanced capitalism , 1989 .

[12]  Johan P. Olsen.  Institutional Design in Democratic Contexts , 1997 .

[13]  D. Baker,et al.  A NEW ZEALAND REVOLUTION , 1990 .

[14]  Guje Sevón,et al.  Deinstitutionalization and the Logic of Fashion Kjell-Arne Røvik , 1996 .

[15]  C. Hood.  Individualized Contracts For Top Public Servants: Copying Business, Path‐Dependent Political Re‐Engineering—or Trobriand Cricket? , 1998 .

[16]  B. Peters,et al.  Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms , 1998 .

[17]  R. Gregory,et al.  Social Capital Theory and Administrative Reform: Maintaining Ethical Probity in Public Service , 1999 .

[18]  Donald F. Kettl,et al.  The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links , 1997 .

[19]  A. Armstrong.,et al.  Lessons from Experience , 1985 .

[20]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance in a Changing Environment , 1995 .

[21]  Pat Walsh,et al.  Public Management: The New Zealand Model , 1996 .

[22]  P. Aucoin.  Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxes and Pendulums , 1990 .

[23]  Allen G. Schick,et al.  The spirit of reform : managing the New Zealand state sector in a time of change , 1996 .

[24]  Per Lægreid.  Top Civil Servants Under Contract , 2000 .

[25]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  The Reforming Organization. , 1996 .

[26]  H. Schwartz.  Small States in Big Trouble: State Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden in the 1980s , 1994, World Politics.

[27]  J. Boston.  Reshaping the state : New Zealand's bureaucratic revolution , 1993 .

[28]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models , 1996 .

[29]  J. Boston.  Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits to Contracting Out , 1994 .

[30]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[31]  Tom Christensen,et al.  Administrative reform policy: the case of Norway , 1998 .

[32]  G. Scott,et al.  Reform of the Core Public Sector: New Zealand Experience , 1990 .

[33]  Lloyd S. Pettegrew,et al.  The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Action in Organizations , 1991 .

[34]  R. Mascarenhas.  Reform of the Public Service in Australia and New Zealand , 1990 .

[35]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Justification by Works or by Faith? , 1995 .

[36]  Herman Bakvis,et al.  The hollow crown : countervailing trends in core executives , 1997 .

[37]  Moshe Maor,et al.  The Paradox of Managerialism , 1999 .

[38]  P. Massey.  New Zealand: Market Liberalization in a Developed Economy , 1995 .

[39]  C. Hood.  A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS , 1991 .

[40]  Allen G. Schick,et al.  Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zealand's Reforms , 1998 .

[41]  Herman Bakvis,et al.  The hollow crown : countervailing trends in core executives , 1997 .

[42]  G. Scott,et al.  Government Reform in New Zealand , 1996 .

[43]  Shaun Goldfinch.  Remaking New Zealand''s economic policy institutional elites as radical innovators , 1998 .