ON THE INITIATION AND CONTINUATION OF DELINQUENCY

An ongoing debate among criminologists concerns the merits of studying different dimensions of offending, such as initiation, frequency, and duration. One critical point of contention is whether separate models are necessary to explain different aspects of offending. The current study uses empirical data to assess whether different models are required to explain initiation and continuation of delinquent behavior. Using the first four waves of the National Youth Survey, we focus on the predictive ability of variables central to social control, labelling, differential association, and urbanism perspectives. We find many similarities and some differences between models for initiation and continuation of delinquency. We discuss the relevance of these results for developing a more comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior.

[1]  R. Paternoster,et al.  Absolute and Restrictive Deterrence in a Panel of Youth: Explaining the Onset, Persistence/Desistance, and Frequency of Delinquent Offending , 1989 .

[2]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  CRIMINAL CAREER RESEARCH: ITS VALUE FOR CRIMINOLOGY* , 1988 .

[3]  Frank Tannenbaum.  Crime and the community , 1938 .

[4]  David P. Farrington,et al.  THE ONSET AND PERSISTENCE OF OFFENDING , 1992 .

[5]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  R. Paternoster,et al.  DISAGGREGATING SELF-REPORTED DELINQUENCY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY* , 1988 .

[7]  James R. Kluegel,et al.  Social Inequality and Predatory Criminal Victimization: An Exposition and Test of a Formal Theory , 1981 .

[8]  L. Wirth,et al.  Urbanism as a Way of Life , 1938, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach , 1979 .

[10]  Robert L. Akers,et al.  A Differential Association-Reinforcement Theory of Criminal Behavior , 1966 .

[11]  Robert J. Bursik,et al.  SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION AND THEORIES OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY: PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS* , 1988 .

[12]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Influences on Urbanism: A Test of Predictions from Three Perspectives , 1989 .

[13]  Christy A. Visher,et al.  Dimensions of Delinquency: Exploring the Correlates of Participation, Frequency, and Persistence of Delinquent Behavior , 1991 .

[14]  R. Matsueda.  Reflected Appraisals, Parental Labeling, and Delinquency: Specifying a Symbolic Interactionist Theory , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  R. Matsueda.  The Dynamics of Moral Beliefs and Minor Deviance , 1989 .

[16]  J. Toby.  Social Disorganization and Stake in Conformity: Complementary Factors in the Predatory Behavior of Hoodlums , 1957 .

[17]  Douglas A. Smith.  The Organizational Context of Legal Control , 1984 .

[18]  C. Fischer.  Toward a Subcultural Theory of Urbanism , 1975, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  A. Blumstein,et al.  NOT ALL CRIMINAL CAREER MODELS ARE EQUALLY VALID , 1992 .

[20]  D. Greenberg.  MODELING CRIMINAL CAREERS , 1991 .

[21]  P. Burke,et al.  Factors Affecting Postarrest Dispositions: A Model for Analysis , 1975 .

[22]  G. Roger Jarjoura,et al.  Social Structure and Criminal Victimization , 1988 .

[23]  I. Piliavin,et al.  Delinquency, Situational Inducements, and Commitment to Conformity , 1965 .

[24]  A. Reiss,.  Delinquency as the Failure of Personal and Social Controls , 1951 .

[25]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The Labeling perspective and delinquency: An elaboration of the theory and an assessment of the evidence , 1989 .

[26]  Michael R. Gottfredson,et al.  SCIENCE, PUBLIC POLICY, AND THE CAREER PARADIGM* , 1988 .

[27]  D. Nagin,et al.  Participation in and frequency of delinquent behavior: A test for structural differences , 1990 .

[28]  L. Lanza-Kaduce,et al.  Social learning and deviant behavior: a specific test of a general theory. , 1979, American sociological review.

[29]  C. Wellford.  Labelling Theory and Criminology: An Assessment , 1975 .