Mobile-bearing Knees Reduce Rotational Asymmetric Wear

Polyethylene wear of bearing components is the most common long-term complication in total knee arthroplasty. One would anticipate differing kinematics would generate different wear patterns (including wear type, degree, and symmetry) on the articulating surface of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing inserts. Because mobile-bearing designs facilitate movement of the insert relative to the tray when the knee rotates, we hypothesized mobile-bearing designs would reduce the incidence of rotational asymmetric wear. We examined 51 worn tibial inserts, including 15 from mobile-bearing rotating-platform posterior-cruciate-sacrificing dished prostheses and 36 from fixed-bearing posterior-cruciate-retaining flat prostheses, which were retrieved at revision surgery with an average implantation time of 115 months. We divided wear types into low-grade wear (burnishing, abrasion, and cold flow) and high-grade wear (scratching, pitting, metal embedding, and delamination) to assess wear degree of polyethylene. To assess symmetry of wear, the insert surface was divided into medial and lateral sides and each side was further divided into three equal zones along the anteroposterior direction. Low-grade wear was more common in mobile-bearing knees, whereas high-grade wear was more common in fixed-bearing knees. We identified no internal/external rotational asymmetric wear or anteroposterior asymmetric wear in mobile-bearing knees.

[1]  T. Wright,et al.  Wear of polyethylene in total joint replacements. Observations from retrieved PCA knee implants. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Knee Kinematics of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrificed Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  J O Galante,et al.  Wear patterns on retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts and their relationship to technical considerations during total knee arthroplasty. , 1994, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  J. Liau,et al.  Particle size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris in failed total knee arthroplasties—a comparison between mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  L. Whiteside Effect of Porous‐Coating Configuration on Tibial Osteolysis After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  Chun‐Hsiung Huang,et al.  Long-Term Results of Low Contact Stress Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Replacements , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  R. Malhotra,et al.  A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  A H Burstein,et al.  Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. , 1983, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  Buechel Ff,et al.  New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings. , 1989 .

[10]  G. Engh,et al.  Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty without cement. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  S. Banks,et al.  A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Y. Kim,et al.  Osteolysis around cementless porous-coated anatomic knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  T. Bauer,et al.  Relationship between wear debris particles and polyethylene surface damage in primary total knee arthroplasty. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  A study of the effect of tibial tray rotation on a specific mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do the Polyethylene Bearings Rotate? , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  H. Cotta [On the physiology of joints]. , 1966, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie.

[17]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  S. Gallannaugh,et al.  The Roper-Tuke total elbow arthroplasty. 4- to 10-year results of an unconstrained prosthesis. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  R. E. Jensen,et al.  Analysis of the Failure of 122 Polyethylene Inserts From Uncemented Tibial Knee Components , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  J. Liau,et al.  Osteolysis in Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Mobile-Bearing and Fixed-Bearing Knees , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. a concise follow-up, at a minimum of fifteen years, of a previous report. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  L. Whiteside,et al.  Effect of polyethylene quality on wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  Jiann-Jong Liau,et al.  The influence of surgical malalignment on the contact pressures of fixed and mobile bearing knee prostheses--a biomechanical study. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[24]  L Ryd,et al.  Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties. A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Polyethylene wear in knee arthroplasty. A review. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[26]  D. Bartel,et al.  The problem of surface damage in polyethylene total knee components. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  J. Liau,et al.  Late Dislocation of Rotating Platform in New Jersey Low-Contact Stress Knee Prosthesis , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Polyethylene wear in knee arthroplasty , 1992 .

[29]  J. Limbeek,et al.  Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  J. Fisher,et al.  Quantification of third body damage to the tibial counterface in mobile bearing knees , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[31]  S. Goodman,et al.  Effects of polyethylene particles on tissue surrounding knee arthroplasties in rabbits. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  R C Johnston,et al.  Cemented Rotating-Platform Total Knee Replacement: A Nine to Twelve-Year Follow-up Study* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[33]  J. Galante,et al.  Bone resorption activity of particulate‐stimulated macrophages , 1993, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.