Determinants of Transcription Initiation Directionality in Metazoans

Divergent transcription from promoters and enhancers is pervasive in many species, but it remains unclear if it is a general and passive feature of all eukaryotic cis regulatory elements. To address this, we define promoters and enhancers in C. elegans, D. melanogaster and H. sapiens using ATAC-Seq and investigate the determinants of their transcription initiation directionalities by analyzing genome-wide nascent, cap-selected, polymerase run-on assays. All three species initiate divergent transcription from separate core promoter sequences. Sequence asymmetry downstream of forward and reverse initiation sites, known to be important for termination and stability in H. sapiens, is unique in each species. Chromatin states of divergent promoters are not entirely conserved, but in all three species, the levels of histone modifications on the +1 nucleosome are independent from those on the -1 nucleosome, arguing for independent initiation events. This is supported by an integrative model of H3K4me3 levels and core promoter sequence that is highly predictive of promoter directionality and of two types of promoters: those with balanced initiation directionality and those with skewed directionality. Lastly, D. melanogaster enhancers display variation in chromatin architecture depending on enhancer location, and D. melanogaster promoter regions with dual enhancer/promoter potential are enriched for divergent transcription. Our results point to a high degree of variation in regulatory element transcription initiation directionality within and between metazoans, and to non-passive regulatory mechanisms of transcription initiation directionality in those species.

[1]  K. Struhl,et al.  The Ground State and Evolution of Promoter Region Directionality , 2017, Cell.

[2]  Lan T M Dao,et al.  Genome-wide characterization of mammalian promoters with distal enhancer functions , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[3]  T. Saldi,et al.  RNA Pol II Dynamics Modulate Co-transcriptional Chromatin Modification, CTD Phosphorylation, and Transcriptional Direction. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[4]  Richard G. Jenner,et al.  Regulatory feedback from nascent RNA to chromatin and transcription , 2017, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[5]  William K. M. Lai,et al.  Genome-wide uniformity of human ‘open’ pre-initiation complexes , 2017, Genome research.

[6]  S. Lacadie,et al.  Divergent transcription and epigenetic directionality of human promoters , 2016, The FEBS journal.

[7]  Andreas R. Pfenning,et al.  High-throughput functional comparison of promoter and enhancer activities , 2016, Genome research.

[8]  Seongho Kim ppcor: An R Package for a Fast Calculation to Semi-partial Correlation Coefficients. , 2015, Communications for statistical applications and methods.

[9]  D. Corcoran,et al.  Perspectives on Unidirectional versus Divergent Transcription. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[10]  A. Sandelin,et al.  A Unified Architecture of Transcriptional Regulatory Elements , 2015, bioRxiv.

[11]  David C Fargo,et al.  Bidirectional Transcription Arises from Two Distinct Hubs of Transcription Factor Binding and Active Chromatin. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[12]  D. Corcoran,et al.  Human promoters are intrinsically directional. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[13]  Uwe Ohler,et al.  JAMM: a peak finder for joint analysis of NGS replicates , 2015, Bioinform..

[14]  André L. Martins,et al.  Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[15]  Moritz Herrmann,et al.  Comparative analysis of metazoan chromatin organization , 2014, Nature.

[16]  Fidel Ramírez,et al.  deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  T. Meehan,et al.  An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues , 2014, Nature.

[18]  Daniel Schulz,et al.  Transcriptome Surveillance by Selective Termination of Noncoding RNA Synthesis , 2013, Cell.

[19]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position , 2013, Nature Methods.

[20]  J. Stender,et al.  Remodeling of the enhancer landscape during macrophage activation is coupled to enhancer transcription. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[21]  L. Steinmetz,et al.  Polyadenylation site–induced decay of upstream transcripts enforces promoter directionality , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[22]  Barbara J Meyer,et al.  Condensin controls recruitment of RNA polymerase II to achieve nematode X-chromosome dosage compensation , 2013, eLife.

[23]  C. Glass,et al.  Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription , 2013, Nature.

[24]  Christopher B. Burge,et al.  Promoter directionality is controlled by U1 snRNP and polyadenylation signals , 2013, Nature.

[25]  Łukasz M. Boryń,et al.  Genome-Wide Quantitative Enhancer Activity Maps Identified by STARR-seq , 2013, Science.

[26]  Stephen H. Hughes,et al.  H3K4me3 Interactions with TAF3 Regulate Preinitiation Complex Assembly and Selective Gene Activation , 2013, Cell.

[27]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Precise Maps of RNA Polymerase Reveal How Promoters Direct Initiation and Pausing , 2013, Science.

[28]  Thomas R. Gingeras,et al.  STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner , 2013, Bioinform..

[29]  Alexander S. Garruss,et al.  Enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation by Trithorax-related, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian Mll3/Mll4. , 2012, Genes & development.

[30]  C. Dieterich,et al.  FLEXBAR—Flexible Barcode and Adapter Processing for Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms , 2012, Biology.

[31]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters. , 2012, Cell reports.

[32]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[33]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[34]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[35]  B. Pugh,et al.  Genome-wide structure and organization of eukaryotic pre-initiation complexes , 2011, Nature.

[36]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  mclust Version 4 for R : Normal Mixture Modeling for Model-Based Clustering , Classification , and Density Estimation , 2012 .

[37]  Marcel Martin Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[38]  Piero Carninci,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of promoter architecture in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2011, Genome research.

[39]  Uwe Ohler,et al.  Transcription Initiation Patterns Indicate Divergent Strategies for Gene Regulation at the Chromatin Level , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[40]  Andrew C. Adey,et al.  Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition , 2010, Genome Biology.

[41]  R. Young,et al.  Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Uwe Ohler,et al.  A paired-end sequencing strategy to map the complex landscape of transcription initiation , 2010, Nature Methods.

[43]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[44]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Unlocking the secrets of the genome , 2009, Nature.

[45]  Christophe Malabat,et al.  Widespread bidirectional promoters are the major source of cryptic transcripts in yeast , 2009, Nature.

[46]  Pavel Tomancak,et al.  Motif composition, conservation and condition-specificity of single and alternative transcription start sites in the Drosophila genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[47]  Leighton J. Core,et al.  Nascent RNA Sequencing Reveals Widespread Pausing and Divergent Initiation at Human Promoters , 2008, Science.

[48]  Gene W. Yeo,et al.  Divergent Transcription from Active Promoters , 2008, Science.

[49]  Mikkel H. Schierup,et al.  RNA Exosome Depletion Reveals Transcription Upstream of Active Human Promoters , 2008, Science.

[50]  D. Libri,et al.  Phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain dictates transcription termination choice , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[52]  A. Krogh,et al.  A code for transcription initiation in mammalian genomes. , 2007, Genome research.

[53]  Matthias Mann,et al.  Selective Anchoring of TFIID to Nucleosomes by Trimethylation of Histone H3 Lysine 4 , 2007, Cell.

[54]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[55]  David Sturgill,et al.  Comparative genomics of Drosophila and human core promoters , 2006, Genome Biology.

[56]  F. Leisch FlexMix: A general framework for finite mixture models and latent class regression in R , 2004 .

[57]  D. Seese,et al.  Algorithms for Spectral Analysis of Irregularly Sampled Time Series , 2004 .

[58]  M. Johnston,et al.  The Paf1 complex is required for histone H3 methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p: linking transcriptional elongation to histone methylation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[59]  G. Rubin,et al.  Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome , 2002, Genome Biology.