Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems ( PACIS ) July 2009 Supporting Knowledge Sharing Visibility : A Qualitative Analysis

Knowledge sharing visibility is a critical environmental factor which can reduce social loafing in knowledge sharing. This is especially true in IT-based knowledge sharing. As such, it is imperative that we better understand how to design IT-based Knowledge Management Systems (KMS) to support high knowledge sharing visibility. This paper examines the impact of knowledge management technology functions (e.g., tracking, knowledge storing) on knowledge sharing visibility through qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with participants in a Chinese company. Impact and implications of use for their existing KMS are examined. Results encourage applied statistical, tracking, knowledge distribution and knowledge storing functions for monitoring explicit knowledge sharing, and suggest integration of knowledge maps with communication tools (e.g., instant messenger) to support visibility for implicit knowledge sharing. Extension to use of web 2.0 technologies (e.g., weblogs) in KMS is also explored.

[1]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Redefining Organizational Information Technology-Based Capabilities with an Integrative Framework for Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2005, PACIS.

[2]  J. George Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations , 1992 .

[3]  Gareth R. Jones Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior , 1984 .

[4]  R. Liden,et al.  Social Loafing: A Field Investigation , 2004 .

[5]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The role of information technology in the organization: a review, model, and assessment , 2001 .

[6]  G. Labianca,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital , 2006 .

[7]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[8]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[9]  E. Lawler,et al.  PROPERTIES OF ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE IN RELATION TO JOB ATTITUDES AND JOB BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Martin Friesl,et al.  Exploring cultural impacts on knowledge sharing behavior in project teams - results from a simulation study , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[12]  Sherry L. Piezon,et al.  Online Groups and Social Loafing: Understanding Student-Group Interactions , 2005 .

[13]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[14]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[16]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign , 2011 .

[17]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[18]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Supporting Technologies and Organizational Practices for the Transfer of Knowledge in Virtual Environments , 2006 .

[20]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  Irena K. Hejduk On the way to the future: The knowledge‐based enterprise , 2005 .

[22]  William R. King,et al.  Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system , 2008 .

[23]  Alexander Zeier,et al.  Improving supply chain visibility through RFID data , 2008, 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshop.

[24]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  A Reexamination of the Relations between Size and Various Components of Organizational Complexity. , 1979 .