Development of a simple multidisciplinary arthroplasty wound-assessment instrument: the SMArt Wound Tool.

BACKGROUND There are currently no validated instruments in the orthopedic literature for assessing the healing of acute surgical wounds. The creation of a simple wound-assessment tool would provide a standardized method of reporting wound outcomes. The objective of this study was to systematically develop a wound-assessment tool that can be used to assess the early healing of arthroplasty incisions. METHODS The databases Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane reviews and CINAHL were searched. Articles that described objective assessment of acute incisional wounds were included. Items for the wound-assessment tool were then extracted from eligible studies based on the frequency of reporting. A multidisciplinary panel of wound experts compiled the items into an initial tool to assess key domains of wound healing. The items were reduced through several iterations of panel discussion. RESULTS Our search strategy yielded 3743 results, which were screened by title and abstract. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review for the development of the wound-assessment tool, and 10 domains were extracted based on frequency of reporting. After item reduction, the final version of the wound-assessment tool, the SMArt Wound Tool, contained 3 major domains: blistering, peri-incisional skin colour and exudate type. CONCLUSION There is currently a need for a standardized tool to assess the healing of orthopedic surgical incisions. The Simple Multidisciplinary Arthroplasty (SMArt)Wound Tool provides a simple, objective method of assessing arthroplasty incisions for the presence of early complications.

[1]  D. Dennis,et al.  Infection Prevention in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2015, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[2]  T. A. Gray,et al.  Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Ana Isabel Ribeiro,et al.  Epidemiology and Variability of Orthopaedic Procedures Worldwide , 2011 .

[4]  Peter A Cameron,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Jeremy S. Bond,et al.  Scar-Improving Efficacy of Avotermin Administered into the Wound Margins of Skin Incisions as Evaluated by a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Clinical Trial , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  M. Swank,et al.  Dermabond efficacy in total joint arthroplasty wounds. , 2010, American journal of orthopedics.

[7]  J. Gartlan,et al.  An audit of the adequacy of acute wound care documentation of surgical inpatients. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[8]  Elhadi Sariali,et al.  Total hip arthroplasty revision due to infection: a cost analysis approach. , 2010, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.

[9]  Jan Kottner,et al.  Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review. , 2009, International journal of nursing studies.

[10]  Julie W. Anderson,et al.  Measuring Wound Length, Width, and Area: Which Technique? , 2008, Advances in skin & wound care.

[11]  R. Dega,et al.  Optimal closure of surgical wounds in forefoot surgery: are adhesive strips beneficial? , 2006, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[12]  Jeremy S. Bond,et al.  Visual Analogue Scale Scoring and Ranking: A Suitable and Sensitive Method for Assessing Scar Quality? , 2006, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[13]  J. Vuolo Assessment and management of surgical wounds in clinical practice. , 2006, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[14]  J. Skinner,et al.  The management of wounds following primary lower limb arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study comparing hydrofibre and central pad dressings , 2006, International wound journal.

[15]  J. Harker,et al.  A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing wound dressings used in hip and knee surgery: Aquacel and Tegaderm versus Cutiplast. , 2006, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[16]  Richard White,et al.  Defined and refined: criteria for identifying wound infection revisited. , 2004, British journal of community nursing.

[17]  L. Birchall,et al.  Surgical wound benchmark tool and best practice guidelines. , 2003, British journal of nursing.

[18]  C. B. Kincaid,et al.  Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. , 2000, Ostomy/wound management.