Intra-Firm Learning from Innovative Activity: The Role of Managers, Work Context and Situated Organizational Attention

In this paper we examine the organizational learning that occurs as a result of the innovative activity of new product development. We argue that learning from the new knowledge generated by the innovative activity is influenced by the cognitive context and work conditions in the organization, and can be aided or impeded by factors that affect the attention of individuals in the organization. We use differences in the organizational context - whether the work environment is a knowledge-rich or a knowledge-sparse environment - to show that factors such as manager involvement and perceived competition play an important part in determining whether attention to new knowledge results in greater or lesser learning. We test our hypotheses using empirical data from multiple new product development groups in a multi-division global consumer goods company. Our findings show that the cognitive influences affect the level of learning, and this learning differs based on the contextual situation created by the level of new knowledge. We also show that management oversight at the middle-manager level separates dynamic learning projects from those that are relatively inert. It is proactive middle managers who are able to help an organization acquire new knowledge and renew its innovative resources. These findings have implications for theories of innovation, competition, organizational learning, and managerial decision making.

[1]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[2]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction , 1996 .

[3]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[4]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[5]  Robert A. Burgelman Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .

[6]  H. Greve Exploration and exploitation in product innovation , 2007 .

[7]  P. Attewell Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[8]  Anne S. Miner Structural Evolution Through Idiosyncratic Jobs: The Potential for Unplanned Learning , 1990 .

[9]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[10]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[11]  J. March,et al.  Learning from Samples of One or Fewer , 1991 .

[12]  H. Thomas,et al.  Taxonomic Mental Models in Competitor Definition , 1990 .

[13]  Jing Zhou When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  R. Tindale,et al.  ‘Social Sharedness’ as a Unifying Theme for Information Processing in Groups , 2000 .

[15]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[17]  R. Burt Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[18]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[21]  Robert A. Burgelman A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in the Diversified Major Firm , 1983 .

[22]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Technology, Identity, and Inertia through the Lens of 'The Digital Photography Company' , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[24]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[25]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries , 2002 .

[26]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[27]  H. Simon,et al.  Making Management Decisions: the Role of Intuition and Emotion , 1987 .

[28]  Robert Quinn,et al.  The 1977 quality of employment survey , 1979 .

[29]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[30]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Not All Events are Attended Equally: Toward a Middle-Range Theory of Industry Attention to External Events , 2001 .

[31]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[33]  Paul E. Spector Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[34]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Innovations as Catalysts for Organizational Change: Shifts in Organizational Cognition and Search , 2000 .

[35]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[36]  Elizabeth E. Wierba,et al.  Reading the wind: how middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers , 1997 .

[37]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[38]  Jisun Yu,et al.  The Integration Journey: An Attention-Based View of the Merger and Acquisition Integration Process , 2005 .

[39]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[40]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Entry Mode, Organizational Learning and R&D in Foreign Affiliates: Evidence from japanese Firms , 2003 .

[41]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[43]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[44]  J. Nunnally Introduction to Psychological Measurement , 1970 .

[45]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[46]  J. March Rationality, foolishness, and adaptive intelligence , 2006 .

[47]  R. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation into the New Product Process: Steps, Deficiencies, and Impact , 1986 .

[48]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[49]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[50]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[51]  M. West Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[52]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Identifying Situated Cognition in Organizations , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[53]  Robert K. Kazanjian,et al.  Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective , 1999 .

[54]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[56]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Mindfulness and the Quality of Organizational Attention , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[58]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  Does Focus Improve Operational Performance? Lessons from the Management of Clinical Trials , 2005 .

[59]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[60]  H. Thomas,et al.  Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers , 1995 .

[61]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[62]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[63]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[64]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[65]  Paul E. Spector Using self‐report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method , 1994 .

[66]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Interdependence and Adaptability: Organizational Learning and the Long - Term Effect of Integration , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[67]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[68]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .