Offline Quality Assurance for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans for NRG-HN001 Head and Neck Clinical Trial Using Knowledge-Based Planning

Purpose This study aimed to investigate whether a disease site–specific, multi-institutional knowledge based-planning (KBP) model can improve the quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for patients enrolled in the head and neck NRG-HN001clinical trial and to establish a threshold of improvements of treatment plans submitted to the clinical trial. Methods and Materials Fifty treatment plans for patients enrolled in the NRG-HN001 clinical trial were used to build a KBP model; the model was then used to reoptimize 50 other plans. We compared the dosimetric parameters of the submitted and KBP reoptimized plans. We compared differences between KBP and submitted plans for single- and multi-institutional treatment plans. Results Mean values for the dose received by 95% of the planning target volume (PTV_6996) and for the maximum dose (D0.03cc) of PTV_6996 were 0.5 Gy and 2.1 Gy higher in KBP plans than in the submitted plans, respectively. Mean values for D0.03cc to the brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerve_R, optic nerve_L, and chiasm were 2.5 Gy, 1.9 Gy, 6.4 Gy, 6.6 Gy, and 5.7 Gy lower in the KBP plans than in the submitted plans. Mean values for Dmean to parotid_R and parotid_L glands were 2.2 Gy and 3.8 Gy lower in KBP plans, respectively. In 33 out of 50 KBP plans, we observed improvements in sparing of at least 7 organs at risk (OARs) (brain stem, spinal cord, optic nerves (R & L), chiasm, and parotid glands [R & L]). A threshold of improvement of OARs sparing of 5% of the prescription dose was established for providing the quality assurance results back to the treating institution. Conclusions A disease site–specific, multi-institutional, clinical trial-based KBP model improved sparing of OARs in a large number of reoptimized plans submitted to the NRG-HN001 clinical trial, and the model is being used as an offline quality assurance tool.

[1]  A. Dutreix.  When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy? , 1984, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  A. Boyer,et al.  Tissue Inhomogeneity Corrections for Megavoltage Photon Beams , 2004 .

[3]  Fredrik Carlsson,et al.  Multicriteria optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning for locally advanced cancer of the pancreatic head. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Improving Quality and Consistency in NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0631 for Spine Radiosurgery via Knowledge-Based Planning. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  M. Bolla,et al.  Clinical impact of dosimetry quality assurance programmes assessed by radiobiological modelling of data from the thermoluminescent dosimetry study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[6]  Lei Dong,et al.  Impact of Multi-leaf Collimator Parameters on Head and Neck Plan Quality and Delivery: A Comparison between Halcyon™ and Truebeam® Treatment Delivery Systems , 2018, Cureus.

[7]  David Craft,et al.  Multicriteria plan optimization in the hands of physicians: a pilot study in prostate cancer and brain tumors , 2017, Radiation Oncology.

[8]  K. Breur,et al.  When and how can we improve precision in radiotherapy ? , 2022 .

[9]  W. R. Lee,et al.  Knowledge-based IMRT treatment planning for prostate cancer. , 2011 .

[10]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[11]  Eduard Schreibmann,et al.  Prior‐knowledge treatment planning for volumetric arc therapy using feature‐based database mining , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  P. Levendag,et al.  Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Patricio Simari,et al.  Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Max Dahele,et al.  Can knowledge-based DVH predictions be used for automated, individualized quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans? , 2015, Radiation Oncology.

[15]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Quantifying Unnecessary Normal Tissue Complication Risks due to Suboptimal Planning: A Secondary Study of RTOG 0126. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Analysis of EORTC-1219-DAHANCA-29 trial plans demonstrates the potential of knowledge-based planning to provide patient-specific treatment plan quality assurance. , 2019, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  W. Ng,et al.  Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P. Levendag,et al.  Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT. , 2012, Medical physics.

[19]  Tomas Kron,et al.  Dosimetry for audit and clinical trials: challenges and requirements , 2013 .

[20]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[21]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[22]  B. Slotman,et al.  Effect of Dosimetric Outliers on the Performance of a Commercial Knowledge-Based Planning Solution. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Multicriteria optimization enables less experienced planners to efficiently produce high quality treatment plans in head and neck cancer radiotherapy , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[24]  P. Voet,et al.  Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Aapm.  A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. , 1983, Medical physics.

[26]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[27]  Yaorong Ge,et al.  Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[28]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Improved planning time and plan quality through multicriteria optimization for intensity-modulated radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  B. Slotman,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J J W Lagendijk,et al.  Influence of the linac design on intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck plans , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  M. Guckenberger,et al.  Evaluation of an automated knowledge based treatment planning system for head and neck , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[32]  Ningshan Li,et al.  Dosimetric comparisons of IMRT planning using MCO and DMPO techniques. , 2017, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[33]  D. Followill,et al.  Quality Assurance for Clinical Trials , 2013, Front. Oncol..

[34]  Minsong Cao,et al.  Predicting liver SBRT eligibility and plan quality for VMAT and 4π plans , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[35]  Carsten Brink,et al.  Automatic treatment planning improves the clinical quality of head and neck cancer treatment plans , 2016, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[36]  F. Lohr,et al.  Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases – A comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation , 2017, Radiation oncology.