Effects of Students' Pre- and Post-Laboratory Concept Maps on Students' Attitudes toward Chemistry Laboratory in University General Chemistry.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of scientific discussions based on student-constructed preand post-laboratory concept maps on students’ attitudes toward chemistry laboratory in the university general chemistry. As part of instruction, during the first four laboratory sessions, students were taught how to construct and objectively score concept maps using a scoring scheme with a symbol system. Then, students were required personally to construct a map prior (pre) and after (post) each of the five laboratory experiments. Concept mapping was used as a tool to carry out the scientific discussions about chemical concepts involved in general chemistry laboratory experiments between instructors and students, and among students. In the experimental group, students (N=45) performed their general chemistry laboratory experiments using individual, small and large group discussions based on preand postlaboratory concept maps, whereas the control group students (N=46) performed their laboratory investigations using traditional approaches. A questionnaire of attitudes toward chemistry laboratory (QATCL) developed by the researchers was administrated to both groups to determine the pre-existing differences between the two groups as a pre-test. At the end of the study, QATCL was re-administered to all of the students in both groups to analyze the effect of the intervention on students’ attitudes toward chemistry laboratory. The data were analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). The statistical results of the QATCL post-test scores showed that there was a significant difference favoring the experimental group. Hence, it is concluded that scientific discussions founded on preand post-laboratory concept maps are more effective in improving students’ attitudes toward chemistry laboratory than traditional teaching. * Poster presented at 18 International Conference on Chemical Education “Chemistry Education for the Modern World”, Istanbul, TURKEY, 2004.

[1]  Duncan M. Fraser,et al.  First year chemical engineering students' conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction , 2001 .

[2]  Jane Butler Kahle,et al.  An Investigation of High School Biology Textbooks as Sources of Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Some Suggestions for Teaching Genetics. , 1985 .

[3]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning How to Learn , 1984 .

[4]  Mike Hinchey,et al.  The internal consistency of a concept mapping scoring scheme and its effect on prediction validity , 1996 .

[5]  Edward L. Smith,et al.  Teaching strategies associated with conceptual change learning in Science , 1993 .

[6]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[7]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Content Analysis of General Chemistry Laboratory Manuals for Evidence of Higher-Order Cognitive Tasks , 1999 .

[8]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Using Vee and Concept Maps in Collaborative Settings: Elementary Education Majors Construct Meaning in Physical Science Courses , 1993 .

[9]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  CONCEPT MAPS AS A TOOL TO ASSESS LEARNING IN CHEMISTRY , 1994 .

[10]  Mary B. Nakhleh CHEMICAL EDUCATION RESEARCH IN THE LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT : HOW CAN RESEARCH UNCOVER WHAT STUDENTS ARE LEARNING ? , 1994 .

[11]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The Nature and State of General Chemistry Laboratory Courses Offered by Colleges and Universities in the United States , 1997 .

[12]  D. Kuhn Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[13]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[14]  M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al.  Argument in High School Genetics. , 1997 .

[15]  S. Erduran,et al.  TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .

[16]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[17]  M. G. Jones,et al.  The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity , 1994 .

[18]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[19]  S. Haggerty,et al.  Becoming A Secondary School Science Teacher , 1999 .

[20]  Daniel S. Domin,et al.  A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles , 1999 .

[21]  Menucha Birenbaum,et al.  New Insights Into Learning and Teaching and Their Implications for Assessment , 2003 .