The effects of depth perception in disparity conditions on preference

-We evaluated the effects of disparity conditions such as degree of crossed/uncrossed disparity on the preference occurring during the cognitive process of preference judgment by using psychological and physiological indices. First, we performed paired comparisons of 20 novel shapes without disparity in order to select eight stimuli with minimum bias during preference judgment. Second, we investigated the effects of parallax characteristics on the feeling of preference by using 24 stimuli created by adding three disparity conditions (0.3°, -0.3° and -1.1°) to the eight previously determined stimuli. Moreover, psychological indices were determined by paired comparisons of preference judgment and physiological indices were determined by measurements of eye movement, eye fixation time, and view count during the process of preference judgment. The paired comparisons showed that the participants preferred higher crossed disparity and higher parallax angles. The eye movement measurements showed that eye fixation time and view count increased during conditions of crossed disparity rather than uncrossed disparity, and this increase was directly proportional to the degree of parallax angle. We argue that the reasons for this may be related to the attraction of the crossed disparity and the familiarity and novelty that complements the addition of parallax.

[1]  Takashi Kawai,et al.  Disparity analysis of 3D movies and emotional representations , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Kwanghoon Sohn,et al.  Depth adjustment for stereoscopic images and subjective preference evaluation , 2011, J. Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Chang Yuan,et al.  3D video disparity scaling for preference and prevention of discomfort , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Jari Takatalo,et al.  What do people look at when they watch stereoscopic movies? , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Toyohiko Hatada,et al.  Time series evaluation of visual fatigue and depth sensation using a stereoscopic display , 2009 .

[6]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Roles of familiarity and novelty in visual preference judgments are segregated across object categories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[8]  Jari Takatalo,et al.  Measuring stereoscopic image quality experience with interpretation based quality methodology , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  R. L. Fantz,et al.  Pattern vision in young infants , 1958 .

[11]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed , 1951, Psychometrika.

[12]  Tsuneto Iwasaki,et al.  The tolerance range of binocular disparity on a 3D display based on the physiological characteristics of ocular accommodation , 2009, Displays.

[13]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement , 2022 .

[14]  L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .