On Deploying Wireless Sensors to Achieve Both Coverage and Connectivity

It is well-known that placing disks in the triangular lattice pattern is optimal for achieving full coverage on a plane. With the emergence of wireless sensor networks, however, it is now no longer enough to consider coverage alone when deploying a wireless sensor network; connectivity must also be con-sidered. While moderate loss in coverage can be tolerated by applications of wireless sensor networks, loss in connectivity can be fatal. Moreover, since sensors are subject to unanticipated failures after deployment, it is not enough to have a wireless sensor network just connected, it should be k-connected (for k > 1 ). In this paper, we propose an optimal deployment pattern to achieve both full coverage and 2-connectivity, and prove its optimality for all values of rc/rs, where rc is the communication radius, and rs is the sensing radius. We also prove the optimality of a previously proposed deployment pattern for achieving both full coverage and 1-connectivity, when rc/rs < √3 .Finally, we compare the efficiency of some popular regular deployment patterns such as the square grid and triangular lattice, in terms of the number of sensors needed to provide coverage and connectivity.

[1]  Chen Zhang,et al.  ExScal: elements of an extreme scale wireless sensor network , 2005, 11th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA'05).

[2]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[3]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  Efficient deployment algorithms for ensuring coverage and connectivity of wireless sensor networks , 2005, First International Conference on Wireless Internet (WICON'05).

[4]  Jennifer C. Hou,et al.  Maintaining Sensing Coverage and Connectivity in Large Sensor Networks , 2005, Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks.

[5]  Bin Lin,et al.  On Deploying Wireless Sensors to Achieve Both Coverage and Connectivity , 2009 .

[6]  Tarek F. Abdelzaher,et al.  Analysis of Target Detection Performance for Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, DCOSS.

[7]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks , 2005, TOSN.

[8]  Guoliang Xing,et al.  Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration in wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[9]  Anish Arora,et al.  Analyzing the yield of ExScal, a large-scale wireless sensor network experiment , 2005, 13TH IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP'05).

[10]  J. Meigs,et al.  WHO Technical Report , 1954, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  Vinayak S. Naik,et al.  A line in the sand: a wireless sensor network for target detection, classification, and tracking , 2004, Comput. Networks.

[12]  Koushik Kar,et al.  Low-coordination topologies for redundancy in sensor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[13]  Gang Zhou,et al.  Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[14]  Ramesh Govindan,et al.  Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[15]  R. Kershner The Number of Circles Covering a Set , 1939 .