How the World Trade Organisation is shaping domestic policies in health care

High up on the agenda of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is the privatisation of education, health, welfare, social housing and transport. The WTO's aim is to extend the free market in the provision of traditional public services. Governments in Europe and the US link the expansion of trade in public services to economic success, and with the backing of powerful medico-pharmaceutical, insurance, and service corporations, the race is on to capture the share of gross domestic product that governments currently spend on public services. They will open domestic European services and domestic markets to global competition by government procurement agreements, dispute-settlement procedures, and the investment rules of global financial institutions. The UK has already set up the necessary mechanisms: the introduction of private-sector accounting rules to public services; the funding of public-sector investment via private-public partnerships or the private finance initiative; and the change to capitation funding streams, which allows the substitution of private for public funds and services. We explain the implications of these changes for European public-health-care systems and the threat they pose to universal coverage, solidarity through risk-pooling, equity, comprehensive care, and democratic accountability.

[1]  R. Kuttner Columbia/HCA and the resurgence of the for-profit hospital business. (1) , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Mishra Beyond the Nation State: Social Policy in an Age of Globalization , 1998 .

[3]  Robert Kuttner,et al.  COLUMBIA/HCA AND THE RESURGENCE OF THE FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL BUSINESS (First of Two Parts) , 1996 .

[4]  R. Kuttner Must good HMOs go bad? First of two parts: the commercialization of prepaid group health care. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Shaoul,et al.  PFI in the NHS—is there an economic case? , 1999, BMJ.

[6]  K. Levit,et al.  National health expenditures in 1997: more slow growth. , 1998, Health affairs.

[7]  David J. Price,et al.  The politics of the private finance initiative and the new NHS , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  R. Kuttner THE AMERICAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM : HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE , 1999 .

[9]  J. Shaoul,et al.  Planning the “new” NHS: downsizing for the 21st century , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  Seward Wf National health expenditures. , 1998 .

[11]  J. W. Studebaker The American way , 1935 .

[12]  S. Corby,et al.  Employee Relations in the Public Services: Themes and Issues , 2001 .

[13]  J. Shaoul,et al.  NHS capital expenditure and the private finance initiative—expansion or contraction? , 1999, BMJ.

[14]  W F Seward,et al.  National health expenditures. , 1998, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  R. Kuttner Must good HMOs go bad? Second of two parts. The search for checks and balances. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  H. Waitzkin,et al.  The exportation of managed care to Latin America. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A. Pollock Where should health services go: local authorities versus the NHS? , 1995, BMJ.

[18]  R. Kuttner The American health care system: Wall Street and health care. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Sir Donald Acheson Independent inquiry into inequalities in health report , 1998 .