Performance of different configurations of hybrid growth membrane bioreactor (HG-MBR) for treatment of mixed wastewater

Abstract Improving biomass properties is a practical approach towards minimizing fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). A possible and promising direction for reaching such purposes is the use of a hybrid growth MBR (HG-MBR) which combines activated sludge and biofilm processes. Four types of MBR of different design principles were examined in the present study: (i) an airlift MBR (A-MBR) equipped with a draft tube but without carriers (as a control); (ii) an HG-MBR containing carries but without a draft tube; (iii) an airlift HG-MBR (AHG-MBR) equipped with a draft tube and carriers, and; (iv) a fixed-bed HG-MBR (FHG-MBR) equipped with a draft tube and carriers, including two meshes around the bottom and top of the draft tube. For each of these configurations, a mixed wastewater consisting of domestic wastewater and chicken manure was treated, using a hollow fiber UF membrane module of ZW-10 under ambient desert conditions. The results demonstrate that generating adequate balance between MLSS and biofilm fractions is important in order to achieve high removal efficiency and low fouling tendency in an HG-MBR. The use of AHG-MBR and FHG-MBR has some limitations. Operation of the HG-MBR under appropriate aeration conditions which allows maintaining carriers’ recirculation and is advantageous.

[1]  Chettiyappan Visvanathan,et al.  Evaluation of biofouling phenomenon in suspended and attached growth membrane bioreactor systems , 2006 .

[2]  J. Georgiadis,et al.  Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades , 2008, Nature.

[3]  William J. Koros,et al.  TERMINOLOGY FOR MEMBRANES AND MEMBRANE PROCESSES , 1996 .

[4]  G. Oron,et al.  Optimal performance of an immersed membrane bioreactor equipped with a draft tube for domestic wastewater reclamation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  H Odegaard,et al.  Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Gideon Oron,et al.  Yield stress and rheological characteristics of activated sludge in an airlift membrane bioreactor , 2009 .

[7]  W. J. Ng,et al.  Engineering design approaches for minimum fouling in submerged MBR , 2004 .

[8]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[9]  Gideon Oron,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for assessing optimal operation of ultra-filtration systems for effluent polishing , 2003 .

[10]  Simon Judd,et al.  The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[11]  TorOve Leiknes,et al.  Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) , 2008 .

[12]  R. Shannon,et al.  Evaluation of a second derivative UV/visible spectroscopy technique for nitrate and total nitrogen analysis of wastewater samples. , 2001, Water research.

[13]  M. Wagner,et al.  Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. , 2002, Water research.

[14]  In-Soung Chang,et al.  Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system -- the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling , 1998 .

[15]  Simon Judd,et al.  Membrane Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment , 2002 .

[16]  Xia Huang,et al.  Mechanism of membrane fouling control by suspended carriers in a submerged membrane bioreactor , 2008 .

[17]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[18]  F. Malpei,et al.  Effect of oxygen concentration on biological nitrification and microbial kinetics in a cross-flow membrane bioreactor (MBR) and moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) treating old landfill leachate , 2006 .

[19]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[20]  D. Bixio,et al.  The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse , 2005 .

[21]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water research.

[22]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Factors affecting filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled moving bed biofilm reactor. , 2006, Water research.

[23]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Membrane fouling control in a submerged membrane bioreactor with porous, flexible suspended carriers , 2006 .

[24]  M. Herzberg,et al.  Increased biofilm activity in BGAC reactors , 2005 .

[25]  G. Oron,et al.  Hybrid membrane systems for secondary effluent polishing for unrestricted reuse for agricultural irrigation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  W. Koros,et al.  Terminology for membranes and membrane processes (IUPAC Recommendations 1996) , 1996 .

[27]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Wastewater treatment with particulate biofilm reactors. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[28]  Pierre Le-Clech,et al.  Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment , 2006 .

[29]  Matthias Kraume,et al.  Filterability of activated sludge in membrane bioreactors , 2002 .

[30]  TorOve Leiknes,et al.  The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor , 2007 .