Effects of fracture aperture and roughness on hydraulic and mechanical properties of rocks: implication of seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs

Roughness and aperture are two important characteristic parameters controlling fluid flow in natural joints and fractures. It has been demonstrated by many authors that knowledge of roughness does not directly lead to that of aperture, and aperture should be handled as a separate geometrical descriptor. To determine the normal deformability and flow response of a fracture, the aperture distribution and the mechanical properties of the rock matrix are required. When shearing of joints and fractures is considered, roughness comes into play and affects the evolution of the aperture distribution. The aperture distribution can be evaluated by knowing the correlation between the asperity profiles of the rock walls of a rock fracture. Thus, the distributions of contact area and void space determine the fracture dilation and hydraulic properties during shearing. In the seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs, various equivalent medium theories describing the effective elastic properties of fractured media have been proposed. One relatively simple theory is based on the assumption of the linear slip interface or displacement discontinuity model of fractures. Two parameters are usually used in the linear slip interface model: the normal and shear fracture compliances defined as the ratio of normal (shear) displacement discontinuity and normal (shear) stress. Fracture compliances are by definition functions of mechanical aperture and are also influenced by the roughness (surface asperity distribution) of fracture surfaces. In this study, I investigate the effects of fracture roughness and apertures on the hydraulic and mechanical properties of fractured rock. Specifically, I focus on two kinds of fracture models which are commonly used in describing the effective hydraulic and mechanical (elastic) response of natural fractures. The first is the rough-walled fracture model and the second is an interface with distributions of contacts and voids (called the asperity fracture model).

[1]  Carl E. Renshaw,et al.  On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures , 1995 .

[2]  M. Schoenberg,et al.  Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock , 1995 .

[3]  Michael Schoenberg,et al.  Seismic Anisotropy of Fractured Rocks , 1993 .

[4]  J. Hudson,et al.  THE MEAN TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES OF A FAULT WITH IMPERFECT FACIAL CONTACT , 1997 .

[5]  Mark Chapman,et al.  Derivation of a microstructural poroelastic model , 2002 .

[6]  J. Hudson,et al.  Equivalent medium representation of fractured rock , 2000 .

[7]  M. Schoenberg.  Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces , 1980 .

[8]  David D. Nolte,et al.  Frequency dependence of fracture stiffness , 1992 .

[9]  Ove Stephansson,et al.  A Unified Model for Characterisation and Mechanical Behaviour of Rock Fractures , 2003 .

[10]  S. Tod.  The effects of stress and fluid pressure on the anisotropy of interconnected cracks , 2002 .

[11]  J. Hudson,et al.  Transmission properties of a plane fault , 1996 .

[12]  E. Liu,et al.  Seismic Detection of Fluid Saturation In Aligned Fractures , 2000 .

[13]  Patrick N. J. Rasolofosaon,et al.  Comparison between permeability anisotropy and elasticity anisotropy of reservoir rocks , 2002 .

[14]  J. D. Eshelby.  The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems , 1957, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  Jean Schmittbuhl,et al.  Scale Effects Related to Flow in Rough Fractures , 2001, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[16]  M. Chapman,et al.  Observation and analysis of frequency-dependent anisotropy from a multicomponent VSP at Bluebell-Altamont Field, Utah , 2003 .

[17]  Neville G. W. Cook,et al.  Natural joints in rock: Mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress , 1992 .

[18]  Mark Kachanov,et al.  Microcrack‐induced elastic wave anisotropy of brittle rocks , 1995 .

[19]  C. Pecorari.  Acoustoelasticity in cracked solids , 1997 .

[20]  M. Chapman,et al.  Modelling frequency‐dependent seismic anisotropy in fluid‐saturated rock with aligned fractures: implication of fracture size estimation from anisotropic measurements , 2003 .

[21]  C. C. Pain,et al.  A Simple Model for Deviations from the Cubic Law for a Fracture Undergoing Dilation or Closure , 2003, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[22]  M. S. King,et al.  Modelling the elastic and hydraulic properties of fractured rocks , 1992 .

[23]  C. Sayers.  Stress-induced fluid flow anisotropy in fractured rock , 1990 .

[24]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  DISCRIMINATION OF PORE FLUIDS FROM P AND CONVERTED SHEAR-WAVE AVO ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[25]  Equivalent channel network model for permeability and electrical conductivity of fracture networks , 2002 .

[26]  R. B. Thompson,et al.  Ultrasonic scattering from imperfect interfaces: A quasi-static model , 1984 .

[27]  I. Bayuk,et al.  Correlation between elastic and transport properties of porous cracked anisotropic media , 1998 .

[28]  L. Myer.  Fractures as collections of cracks , 2000 .

[29]  Sebastien F. M. Chastin,et al.  A review of shear wave splitting in the crack-critical crust , 2003 .

[30]  J. Hudson,et al.  Effective elastic properties of heavily faulted structures , 1999 .

[31]  Robert W. Zimmerman,et al.  The effect of contact area on the permeability of fractures , 1989 .