A Meta-theoretic Approach to Theory Integration in Information Systems

This research presents a meta-theoretic analysis of a nomological net for the purpose of identifying potential pathways for theory integration and multi-level theory development. Success in these two areas holds the potential to reduce theory clutter in IS and related social sciences. As a proof-of-concept, we identify theory domains that share ancillary variables or functional/structural components, using a 20-year sample of construct-based quantitative research published in core journals of the IS discipline. Identification of shared variables provides possible extension and integration development that will reduce theory fragmentation and may lead to discovery of fundamental unifying processes that underlie phenomena across disciplines.

[1]  Dirk S. Hovorka,et al.  Developing Interfield Nomological Nets , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  Ron Weber,et al.  Evaluating and Developing Theories in the Information Systems Discipline , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Jingjing Li,et al.  Establishing Nomological Networks for Behavioral Science: a Natural Language Processing Based Approach , 2011, ICIS.

[4]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Challenges of Building Theory by Combining Lenses , 2011 .

[5]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Causality: the elephant in the room in information systems epistemology , 2011, ECIS.

[6]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  A Meta-Theory for Understanding Information Systems Within Sociotechnical Systems , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Handbook of Research on Contemporary Theoretical Models in Information Systems , 2009 .

[8]  Michael Wade,et al.  Theoretical Constructs and Relationships in Information Systems Research , 2009 .

[9]  Jaegwon Kim.  Making Sense of Emergence Jaegwon Kim , 2008 .

[10]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[11]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .

[12]  Katy Börner,et al.  Making Sense of Mankind's Scholarly Knowledge and Expertise: Collecting, Interlinking, and Organizing What We Know and Different Approaches to Mapping (Network) Science , 2007 .

[13]  Matt Germonprez,et al.  A Theory of Tailorable Technology Design , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Katy Börner.  Making Sense of Mankind's Scholarly Knowledge and Expertise: Collecting, Interlinking, and Organizing What We Know and Different Approaches to Mapping (Network) Science , 2007 .

[16]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Integrating Theories of Motivation , 2006 .

[17]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[18]  Gregory T. Smith.  On construct validity: issues of method and measurement. , 2005, Psychological assessment.

[19]  Todd A. Grantham,et al.  Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Science* , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  M. Bunge.  Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge , 2003 .

[21]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  H. Kundel,et al.  Measurement of observer agreement. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[25]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[26]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  Making Sense of Emergence , 1999 .

[27]  P. Alexander,et al.  Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk About Knowledge , 1991 .

[28]  P. Meehl.  Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It , 1990 .

[29]  L. Darden,et al.  Interfield Theories , 1977, Philosophy of Science.

[30]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[31]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[32]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.