An experimental and numerical study on a multi-robot source localization method independent of airflow information in dynamic indoor environments

Abstract To locate contaminant sources in dynamic indoor environments, this study presents an improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) method independent of airflow information and validates the method by combining robot experiments with numerical simulations. The experimental study was first conducted by using three mobile robots to locate an ethanol source in a typical dynamic indoor environment with a fan swinging periodically from left to right. A total of 12 out of 15 experiments were successful, with a success rate of 80%, indicating that the method has a high success rate and strong robustness. Next, the experimental environment was further simulated by CFD, and numerical experiments were conducted. The results show that the success rate and the average number of steps from numerical experiments were consistent with those from robot experiments, indicating the feasibility of using numerical simulations. Finally, the IPSO method was numerically validated and compared with a standard PSO (SPSO) method and a modified PSO method with wind utilization II (WUII) in mixing ventilation (MV) and natural ventilation (NV) cases. With a similar average number of steps, the IPSO method achieved a higher success rate than the comparison methods, indicating the superiority of the IPSO method.

[1]  Piyush M. Tagade,et al.  A Gaussian process emulator approach for rapid contaminant characterization with an integrated multizone-CFD model , 2013, 1305.2565.

[2]  Tom Duckett,et al.  Experimental analysis of gas-sensitive Braitenberg vehicles , 2004, Adv. Robotics.

[3]  Wei-Zhen Lu,et al.  Evaluation of thermal environment by coupling CFD analysis and wireless-sensor measurements of a full-scale room with cooling system , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[4]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  Airborne Chemical Sensing with Mobile Robots , 2006, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[5]  Xianting Li,et al.  Fast Identification of Multiple Indoor Constant Contaminant Sources by Ideal Sensors: A Theoretical Model and Numerical Validation , 2013 .

[6]  Zhiqiang John Zhai,et al.  Prompt tracking of indoor airborne contaminant source location with probability-based inverse multi-zone modeling , 2009 .

[7]  H. Ishida,et al.  Chemical Sensing in Robotic Applications: A Review , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[8]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Experimental verification of tracking algorithm for dynamically-releasing single indoor contaminant , 2011, Building Simulation.

[9]  Lino Marques,et al.  Particle swarm-based olfactory guided search , 2006, Auton. Robots.

[10]  Kevin R. Long,et al.  A variational finite element method for source inversion for convective-diffusive transport , 2003 .

[11]  Z. Zhai,et al.  Inverse identification of multiple outdoor pollutant sources with a mobile sensor , 2017 .

[12]  Takamichi Nakamoto,et al.  Odor-source localization in the clean room by an autonomous mobile sensing system , 1996 .

[13]  Achim J. Lilienthal,et al.  Smelling Nano Aerial Vehicle for Gas Source Localization and Mapping , 2019, Sensors.

[14]  Q. Chen,et al.  Identification of contaminant sources in enclosed environments by inverse CFD modeling. , 2007, Indoor air.

[15]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  Contaminant source identification within a building: Toward design of immune buildings , 2011, Building and Environment.

[16]  Yang Wang,et al.  Odor source localization using a mobile robot in outdoor airflow environments with a particle filter algorithm , 2011, Auton. Robots.

[17]  Hiroshi Ishida,et al.  Mobile robot navigation using vision and olfaction to search for a gas/odor source , 2006, Auton. Robots.

[18]  M. Degroot,et al.  Probability and Statistics , 2021, Examining an Operational Approach to Teaching Probability.

[19]  Zhilong Chen,et al.  Rapid identification of multiple constantly-released contaminant sources in indoor environments with unknown release time , 2014, Building and Environment.

[20]  Zhilong Chen,et al.  Using multi-robot active olfaction method to locate time-varying contaminant source in indoor environment , 2017 .

[21]  Zhuang Jia-jun,et al.  Multi-Robot Odor Source Localization Strategy Based on a Modified Ant Colony Algorithm , 2008 .

[22]  Ali Marjovi,et al.  Optimal spatial formation of swarm robotic gas sensors in odor plume finding , 2013, Autonomous Robots.

[23]  José-Raúl Ruiz-Sarmiento,et al.  A Semantic-Based Gas Source Localization with a Mobile Robot Combining Vision and Chemical Sensing , 2018, Sensors.

[24]  X Liu,et al.  Location identification for indoor instantaneous point contaminant source by probability-based inverse Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling. , 2007, Indoor air.

[25]  Bao-Jie He,et al.  Distribution characteristics, growth, reproduction and transmission modes and control strategies for microbial contamination in HVAC systems: A literature review , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[26]  Guilherme Carrilho da Graça,et al.  Impact of PM2.5 in indoor urban environments: A review , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[27]  Jian Huang,et al.  Odor source localization algorithms on mobile robots: A review and future outlook , 2019, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[28]  Rodney M. Goodman,et al.  Distributed odor source localization , 2002 .

[29]  Zhiqiang Zhai,et al.  Inverse modeling of indoor instantaneous airborne contaminant source location with adjoint probability-based method under dynamic airflow field , 2017 .

[30]  Ali Marjovi,et al.  Multi-robot olfactory search in structured environments , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[31]  Ammar Zakaria,et al.  Integrating SLAM and gas distribution mapping (SLAM-GDM) for real-time gas source localization , 2018, Adv. Robotics.

[32]  Hyondong Oh,et al.  A review of source term estimation methods for atmospheric dispersion events using static or mobile sensors , 2017, Inf. Fusion.

[33]  Ji Wang,et al.  Modified PSO algorithms with "Request and Reset" for leak source localization using multiple robots , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[34]  D. Gong,et al.  Localising odour source using multi-robot and anemotaxis-based particle swarm optimisation , 2012 .

[35]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  Influence of indoor transport and mixing time scales on the performance of sensor systems for characterizing contaminant releases , 2007 .

[36]  Xiaoliang Shao,et al.  Identification of constant contaminant sources in a test chamber with real sensors , 2016 .

[37]  Fei Li,et al.  Locating time-varying contaminant sources in 3D indoor environments with three typical ventilation systems using a multi-robot active olfaction method , 2018 .

[38]  Derek Clements-Croome,et al.  A review of air filtration technologies for sustainable and healthy building ventilation , 2017 .

[39]  Ali Malkawi,et al.  Design-based natural ventilation evaluation in early stage for high performance buildings , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[40]  Tien-Fu Lu,et al.  3D framework combining CFD and MATLAB techniques for plume source localization research , 2013 .

[41]  A J Gadgil,et al.  Responding to sudden pollutant releases in office buildings: 1. Framework and analysis tools. , 2003, Indoor air.

[42]  W. Jatmiko,et al.  A pso-based mobile robot for odor source localization in dynamic advection-diffusion with obstacles environment: theory, simulation and measurement , 2007, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[43]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Modeling of volatile organic compounds degradation by photocatalytic oxidation reactor in indoor air: A review , 2019, Building and Environment.

[44]  X Liu,et al.  Inverse modeling methods for indoor airborne pollutant tracking: literature review and fundamentals. , 2007, Indoor air.

[45]  Yang Wang,et al.  Adapting an Ant Colony Metaphor for Multi-Robot Chemical Plume Tracing , 2012, Sensors.

[46]  Jiheng Xu,et al.  An improved particle swarm optimization method for locating time-varying indoor particle sources , 2018, Building and Environment.

[47]  Ming Jin,et al.  Automated mobile sensing: Towards high-granularity agile indoor environmental quality monitoring , 2018 .