Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens.

Qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quantitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.

[1]  V. Bergum Being a Phenomenological Researcher , 1991 .

[2]  Janice M. Morse,et al.  Qualitative Nursing Research: A Free-for-All? , 1991 .

[3]  A. J. Walters The phenomenological movement: implications for nursing research. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  M. Jasper,et al.  Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  F. Biley,et al.  Understanding grounded theory: principles and evaluation. , 1997, Nurse researcher.

[6]  P. Brink Issues of Reliability and Validity , 1991 .

[7]  J. Cutcliffe How do nurses inspire and instil hope in terminally ill HIV patients? , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  P. Benner From novice to expert. , 1984, The American journal of nursing.

[9]  J. Appleton,et al.  Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity and reliability. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  P. Benner,et al.  The Primacy of Caring: Stress and Coping in Health and Illness , 1989 .

[11]  P. Burnard A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. , 1991, Nurse education today.

[12]  David L. Altheide,et al.  Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[13]  The variety of qualitative research. Part one: Introduction to the problem. , 1997, Nurse education today.

[14]  R. Hepburn,et al.  BEING AND TIME , 2010 .

[15]  Peggy L. Chinn,et al.  Theory and nursing: A systematic approach , 1983 .

[16]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[17]  B. Carper Fundamental Patterns of Knowing in Nursing , 1978, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[18]  D. Parker,et al.  Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  Barry Turner,et al.  Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory , 1981 .

[20]  J. Cutcliffe,et al.  Empathy, Students and the Problems of Genuineness: Can we Develop Empathy on a Short Skills-Based Counselling Course? , 1998 .

[21]  P. Ashworth Participant Agreement in the Justification of Qualitative Findings , 1993 .

[22]  Alternative approaches to establishing reliability and validity. , 1995, British journal of nursing.

[23]  P. Lyne,et al.  Validity in qualitative health care research: an exploration of the impact of individual researcher perspectives within collaborative enquiry. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[24]  K. Melia,et al.  "Tell it as it is'--qualitative methodology and nursing research: understanding the student nurse's world. , 1982, Journal of advanced nursing.

[25]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[26]  J. Cutcliffe,et al.  Empathy, students and the problems of genuineness: Paul Cassedy and John Cutcliffe ask whether empathy is a quality that students can develop on a short skills-based counselling course , 1998 .

[27]  P. Munhall,et al.  Nursing Research: A Qualitative Perspective , 1987 .

[28]  P. Ashworth The variety of qualitative research. Part two: Non-positivist approaches. , 1997, Nurse education today.

[29]  A. Meléis Theoretical Nursing: Development and Progress , 1984 .

[30]  R Behi,et al.  Triangulation: the best of all worlds? , 1995, British journal of nursing.

[31]  L. Moody,et al.  Advancing Nursing Science Through Research , 1990 .

[32]  E. Husserl The idea of phenomenology , 1980 .

[33]  M. Hammersley What's Wrong With Ethnography? , 1991 .

[34]  S. Schutz Exploring the benefits of a subjective approach in qualitative nursing research. , 1994, Journal of advanced nursing.

[35]  C. Begley,et al.  Using triangulation in nursing research. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[36]  J. Cutcliffe Qualitative research in nursing: a quest for quality. , 1997, British journal of nursing.

[37]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .