Network integration of ecological extremal principles: exergy, emergy, power, ascendency, and indirect effects

Abstract Self organization in ecosystems has been postulated to be directed by a number of seemingly unrelated goal functions or extremal principles. These include exergy , the useful work content of energy, which measures distance from thermodynamic ground; emergy , which increases in proportion to the number of steps energy has taken away from its point of input to a system; power , which is work per unit time, and can be measured as the total energy flow in an ecosystem; ascendency , which combines a mutual information measure of the distribution of flows in a system network with the total flow; and indirect effects , which concern relationships at a distance in energy networks. S.E. Jorgensen recently obtained high correlations between exergy, emergy, ascendency, and the ratio of indirect to direct effects, in a set of ecosystem models. These results suggest that these optimality criteria may be formally related. This paper shows, for systems at macroscopic steady states, that they are. Exergy, emergy, power, ascendency, and indirect effects all have common origins in the path structure and associated microscopic dynamics of energy and matter flows and storages in ecosystem networks. Thus, these organizational measures, originally derived from different perspectives on ecosystems, are in fact related through a common basis.

[1]  B. C. Patten Environs: Relativistic Elementary Particles for Ecology , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[2]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  Dominance of Indirect Causality in Ecosystems , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[3]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[4]  H Nakajima,et al.  Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. I. The chain rule approach. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.

[5]  Bernard C. Patten,et al.  ENERGY CYCLING IN THE ECOSYSTEM , 1985 .

[6]  A. D. Bazykin Analysis of ecological systems: State-of-the-art in ecological modelling: William K. Lauenroth, Gaylord V. Skogerboe and Marshall Flug (Editors). Developments in Environmental Modelling, 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983. 992 pp., Dfl. 320.00. ISBN 0-444-42179-3 , 1986 .

[7]  G. Bonan Analysis of neighborhood competition among annual plants: implications of a plant growth model , 1993 .

[8]  P. Astor 15 – The Sensitivity Substructure of Ecosystems , 1976 .

[9]  A. J. Lotka Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  A holistic approach to ecological modelling , 1979 .

[11]  Hisao Nakajima,et al.  Sensitivity and stability of flow networks , 1992 .

[12]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Robert W. Bosserman,et al.  17 – Propagation of Cause in Ecosystems , 1976 .

[14]  B. C. Patten,et al.  On the Quantitative Dominance of Indirect Effects in Ecosystems , 1983 .

[15]  R. Ulanowicz Growth and development : ecosystems phenomenology , 1988 .

[16]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environment, Power, and Society , 1972 .

[17]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Complex ecology : the part-whole relation in ecosystems , 1995 .

[18]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Information theoretical analysis of functional temporal and spatial organization in flow networks , 1992 .