Development of a training phantom for compression breast elastography—comparison of various elastography systems and numerical simulations

Abstract. The elastic properties of tissue are related to tissue composition and pathological changes. It has been observed that many pathological processes increase the elastic modulus of soft tissue compared to normal. Ultrasound compression elastography is a method of characterization of elastic properties that has been the focus of many research efforts in the last two decades. In medical radiology, compression elastography is provided as an additional tool with ultrasound B-mode in the existing scanners, and the combined features of elastography and echography act as a promising diagnostic method in breast cancer detection. However, the full capability of the ultrasound elastography technique together with B-mode has not been utilized by novice radiologists due to the nonavailability of suitable, appropriately designed tissue-mimicking phantoms. Since different commercially available ultrasound elastographic scanners follow their own unique protocols, training novice radiologists is becoming cumbersome. The main focus of this work is to develop a tissue-like agar-based phantom, which mimics breast tissue with common abnormal lesions like fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma in a clinically perceived way and compares the sonographic and elastographic appearances using different commercially available systems. In addition, the developed phantoms are simulated using the finite-element method, and ideal strain images are generated. Strain images from experiment and simulation are compared based on image contrast parameters, namely contrast transfer efficiency (CTE) and observed strain, and they are in good agreement. The strain image contrast of malignant inclusions is significantly improved compared to benign inclusions, and the trend of CTE is similar for all elastographic scanners under investigation.

[1]  R. Barr,et al.  Sonographic Breast Elastography , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[3]  I Céspedes,et al.  Reduction of stress nonuniformities by apodization of compressor displacement in elastography. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  P. Hoskins,et al.  Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  C. P. Winlove,et al.  Ultrasound-induced contraction of the carotid artery in vitro. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for testing elastography systems. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  Ram Mohan Vasu,et al.  Design, fabrication, and characterization of a tissue-equivalent phantom for optical elastography. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[8]  W. Walker,et al.  Development and characterization of a vitreous mimicking material for radiation force imaging , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Martin O Culjat,et al.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  Jacinta E Browne,et al.  Investigation of the effect of subcutaneous fat on image quality performance of 2D conventional imaging and tissue harmonic imaging. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  A. Saada Elasticity : theory and applications , 1993 .

[12]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Contrast-transfer improvement for electrode displacement elastography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  C. R. Hill,et al.  Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans. , 1982, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Gregg Trahey,et al.  Observations of Tissue Response to Acoustic Radiation Force: Opportunities for Imaging , 2002, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  J E Browne,et al.  Review of ultrasound elastography quality control and training test phantoms , 2012 .

[18]  Smita Asthana,et al.  Breast and cervical cancer risk in India: an update. , 2014, Indian journal of public health.

[19]  J Ophir,et al.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  R Willinger,et al.  Copolymer-in-oil phantom materials for elastography. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[22]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[23]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  Real time tissue elasticity imaging using the combined autocorrelation method , 2002, Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.

[24]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Phantom materials for elastography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  T. Varghese,et al.  Tissue-mimicking agar/gelatin materials for use in heterogeneous elastography phantoms , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  F. Kallel,et al.  Tradeoffs in Elastographic Imaging , 2001, Ultrasonic imaging.

[27]  Mark L Palmeri,et al.  Effect of Graphite Concentration on Shear-Wave Speed in Gelatin-Based Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms , 2011, Ultrasonic imaging.

[28]  Ramasubba Reddy Machireddy,et al.  Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms. , 2014, Ultrasonics.

[29]  S Suresh,et al.  Fuzzy-Based Classification of Breast Lesions Using Ultrasound Echography and Elastography , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[30]  S. Seshadri,et al.  Characterization of biomechanical properties of agar based tissue mimicking phantoms for ultrasound stiffness imaging techniques. , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[31]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[32]  J. Gennisson,et al.  Estimation of polyvinyl alcohol cryogel mechanical properties with four ultrasound elastography methods and comparison with gold standard testings , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[33]  G Finet,et al.  Axial strain imaging of intravascular data: results on polyvinyl alcohol cryogel phantoms and carotid artery. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Gregg Trahey,et al.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging of In Vivo Vastus Medialis Muscle Under Varying Isometric Load , 2002, Ultrasonic imaging.

[35]  A. Manduca,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. , 1995, Science.

[36]  J Ophir,et al.  Limits on the contrast of strain concentrations in elastography. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.