Toughness amplification in natural composites

Abstract Natural structural materials such as bone and seashells are made of relatively weak building blocks, yet they exhibit remarkable combinations of stiffness, strength and toughness. This performance can be largely explained by their “staggered microstructure”: stiff inclusions of high aspect ratio are laid parallel to each other with some overlap, and bonded by a softer matrix. While stiffness and strength are now well understood for staggered composites, the mechanisms involved in fracture are still largely unknown. This is a significant lack since the amplification of toughness with respect to their components is by far the most impressive feature in natural staggered composites such as nacre or bone. Here a model capturing the salient mechanisms involved in the cracking of a staggered structure is presented. We show that the pullout of inclusions and large process zones lead to tremendous toughness by far exceeding that of individual components. The model also suggests that a material like nacre cannot reach steady state cracking, with the implication that the toughness increases indefinitely with crack advance. These findings agree well with existing fracture data, and for the first time relate microstructural parameters with overall toughness. These insights will prove useful in the design of biomimetic materials, and provide clues on how bone fractures at the nano and microscales.

[1]  Francois Barthelat,et al.  Biomimetics for next generation materials , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[2]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Mechanics of Transformation‐Toughening in Brittle Materials , 1982 .

[3]  Jacqueline A. Cutroni,et al.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture , 2005, Nature materials.

[4]  Paul Roschger,et al.  From brittle to ductile fracture of bone , 2006, Nature materials.

[5]  Y. Bai,et al.  Effects of nanostructures on the fracture strength of the interfaces in nacre , 2003 .

[6]  F. Barthelat,et al.  On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure , 2007 .

[7]  Zhiping Xu,et al.  Nanoconfinement Controls Stiffness, Strength and Mechanical Toughness of Β-sheet Crystals in Silk , 2010 .

[8]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Mineralized collagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[9]  A. Evans Perspective on the Development of High‐Toughness Ceramics , 1990 .

[10]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Tough, Bio-Inspired Hybrid Materials , 2008, Science.

[11]  Mario Viani,et al.  Molecular mechanistic origin of the toughness of natural adhesives, fibres and composites , 1999, Nature.

[12]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Molecular nanomechanics of nascent bone: fibrillar toughening by mineralization , 2007 .

[13]  B. Lawn Fracture of Brittle Solids by Brian Lawn , 1993 .

[14]  Christine Ortiz,et al.  Bioinspired Structural Materials , 2008, Science.

[15]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre–Mother of Pearl , 2007 .

[16]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Deformation mechanisms in nacre , 2001 .

[17]  Franck J. Vernerey,et al.  An interactive micro-void shear localization mechanism in high strength steels , 2007 .

[18]  F. Barthelat,et al.  The deformation and fracture of Nacre-Mother of Pearl , 2007 .

[19]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[20]  R. Ritchie,et al.  On the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Materials , 2009 .

[21]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[22]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The mechanical efficiency of natural materials , 2004 .

[23]  Wolfgang Wagermaier,et al.  Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. P. Jackson,et al.  The mechanical design of nacre , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[26]  P. de Gennes,et al.  Why is nacre strong? Elastic theory and fracture mechanics for biocomposites with stratified structures , 2001 .

[27]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Biological Structures Mitigate Catastrophic Fracture Through Various Strategies , 2005 .

[28]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease. , 2009, Nature materials.

[29]  S. Kotha,et al.  Micromechanical model of nacre tested in tension , 2001 .

[30]  Huajian Gao Application of Fracture Mechanics Concepts to Hierarchical Biomechanics of Bone and Bone-like Materials , 2006 .

[31]  G. Mayer,et al.  Rigid Biological Systems as Models for Synthetic Composites , 2005, Science.

[32]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Plasticity and toughness in bone , 2009 .

[33]  A. Evans,et al.  Mechanisms of toughening in rubber toughened polymers , 1986 .

[34]  Joel W. Ager,et al.  Fracture, aging, and disease in bone , 2006 .

[35]  Reza Rabiei,et al.  Failure mode transition in nacre and bone-like materials. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[36]  John D. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[37]  Francois Barthelat,et al.  Nacre from mollusk shells: a model for high-performance structural materials , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.