Phase-resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI-derived Ventilation and Perfusion Parameters Predict Future Lung Transplant Loss.

Background Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the physiologic correlate of chronic rejection, remains a major barrier to long-term survival following lung transplant. Biomarkers for early prediction of future transplant loss or death due to CLAD might open a window of opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment of CLAD. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic use of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI in predicting CLAD-related transplant loss or death. Materials and Methods In this prospective, longitudinal, single-center study, PREFUL MRI-derived ventilation and parenchymal lung perfusion parameters of bilateral lung transplant recipients without clinically suspected CLAD were assessed 6-12 months (baseline) and 2.5 years (follow-up) after transplant. MRI scans were acquired between August 2013 and December 2018. Regional flow volume loop (RFVL)-based ventilated volume (VV) and perfused volume were calculated using thresholds and spatially combined as ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. Spirometry data were obtained on the same day. Exploratory models were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and subsequent survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier, hazard ratios [HRs]) of CLAD-related graft loss were performed to compare clinical and MRI parameters as clinical end points. Results At baseline MRI examination, 132 clinically stable patients of 141 patients (median age, 53 years [IQR, 43-59 years]; 78 men) were included (nine were excluded for deaths not associated with CLAD), 24 of which had CLAD-related graft loss (death or retransplant) within the observational period of 5.6 years. PREFUL MRI-derived RFVL VV was a predictor of poorer survival (cutoff, 92.3%; log-rank P = .02; HR for graft loss, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.1, 5.7]; P = .02), while perfused volume (P = .12) and spirometry (P = .33) were not predictive of differences in survival. In the evaluation of percentage change at follow-up MRI (92 stable patients vs 11 with CLAD-related graft loss), mean RFVL (cutoff, 97.1%; log-rank P < .001; HR, 7.7 [95% CI: 2.3, 25.3]), V/Q defect (cutoff, 498%; log-rank P = .003; HR, 6.6 [95% CI: 1.7, 25.0]), and forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (cutoff, 60.8%; log-rank P < .001; HR, 7.9 [95% CI: 2.3, 27.4]; P = .001) were predictive of poorer survival within 2.7 years (IQR, 2.2-3.5 years) after follow-up MRI. Conclusion Phase-resolved functional lung MRI ventilation-perfusion matching parameters were predictive of future chronic lung allograft dysfunction-related death or transplant loss in a large prospective cohort who had undergone lung transplant. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fain and Schiebler in this issue.

[1]  J. Hohlfeld,et al.  PREFUL MRI Depicts Dual Bronchodilator Changes in COPD: A Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2022, Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging.

[2]  H. Marshall,et al.  A dual center and dual vendor comparison study of automated perfusion‐weighted phase‐resolved functional lung magnetic resonance imaging with dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cystic fibrosis , 2022, Pulmonary circulation.

[3]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Xenon MRI for Future Assessment of Lung Function and Treatment Response: A Commentary , 2021, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[4]  F. Wacker,et al.  Perfusion quantification using voxel‐wise proton density and median signal decay in PREFUL MRI , 2021, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Shah,et al.  Use of donor-derived-cell-free DNA as a marker of early allograft injury in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) to predict the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). , 2021, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[6]  F. Wacker,et al.  Repeatability of dynamic 3D phase‐resolved functional lung (PREFUL) ventilation MR Imaging in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy volunteers , 2021, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  F. Wacker,et al.  Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers. , 2020, PloS one.

[8]  F. Wacker,et al.  Flow Volume Loop and Regional Ventilation Assessment Using Phase‐Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL) MRI: Comparison With 129Xenon Ventilation MRI and Lung Function Testing , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  F. Wacker,et al.  Repeatability of Phase‐Resolved Functional Lung (PREFUL)‐MRI Ventilation and Perfusion Parameters in Healthy Subjects and COPD Patients , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  F. Wacker,et al.  3D phase‐resolved functional lung ventilation MR imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic pulmonary disease , 2020, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  A. Aliverti,et al.  Quantitative Multivolume Proton-Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Lung Transplant Recipients: Comparison With Computed Tomography and Spirometry. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[12]  S. Toyooka,et al.  Lung perfusion scintigraphy to detect chronic lung allograft dysfunction after living-donor lobar lung transplantation , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[13]  R. Seethamraju,et al.  Comparison of Functional Free-Breathing Pulmonary 1H and Hyperpolarized 129Xe Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Pediatric Cystic Fibrosis. , 2020, Academic radiology.

[14]  Yongming Dai,et al.  Clinical Potential of UTE‐MRI for Assessing COVID‐19: Patient‐ and Lesion‐Based Comparative Analysis , 2020, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  S. Murray,et al.  Fibroproliferation in chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Association of mesenchymal cells in bronchoalveolar lavage with phenotypes and survival. , 2020, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  J. Diamond,et al.  Emerging biomarkers in chronic lung allograft dysfunction , 2020, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[17]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Free‐breathing quantification of regional ventilation derived by phase‐resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI , 2019, NMR in biomedicine.

[18]  F. Wacker,et al.  MRI‐derived regional flow‐volume loop parameters detect early‐stage chronic lung allograft dysfunction , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  G. Verleden,et al.  Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition and update of restrictive allograft syndrome-A consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. , 2019, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[20]  G. Verleden,et al.  Chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Definition, diagnostic criteria, and approaches to treatment-A consensus report from the Pulmonary Council of the ISHLT. , 2019, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[21]  F. Wacker,et al.  Comparison of quantitative regional ventilation‐weighted fourier decomposition MRI with dynamic fluorinated gas washout MRI and lung function testing in COPD patients , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  T. Welte,et al.  Detection of chronic lung allograft dysfunction using ventilation‐weighted Fourier decomposition MRI , 2018, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[23]  F. Wacker,et al.  Feasibility of quantitative regional ventilation and perfusion mapping with phase‐resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI in healthy volunteers and COPD, CTEPH, and CF patients , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Lance R. Martin,et al.  Noninvasive monitoring of infection and rejection after lung transplantation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  C. Merlo,et al.  Serial monitoring of exhaled nitric oxide in lung transplant recipients. , 2015, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[26]  F. Wacker,et al.  Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Oxygen-enhanced T1-Mapping MR Imaging of the Lung. , 2015, Radiology.

[27]  G. Verleden,et al.  A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[28]  Ella A. Kazerooni,et al.  CT-based Biomarker Provides Unique Signature for Diagnosis of COPD Phenotypes and Disease Progression , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[29]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Oxygen-sensitive 3He-MRI in bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation , 2007, European Radiology.

[30]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Clinical aspects of the apparent diffusion coefficient in 3He MRI: Results in healthy volunteers and patients after lung transplantation , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  J. Hankinson,et al.  Standardisation of spirometry , 2005, European Respiratory Journal.

[32]  H. Kauczor,et al.  3He-MRI in follow-up of lung transplant recipients , 2004, European Radiology.

[33]  G. Snell,et al.  Post-lung transplant bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is characterized by increased exhaled nitric oxide levels and epithelial inducible nitric oxide synthase. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.