Equilibrium with predictive routeing in the online version of the Braess paradox

The agents of a distributed adaptive system perceive the current state of their environment and make decisions which action to perform. The actions are both reactive and proactive. Reactivity can be supported by the availability of real-time data and proactivity can be supported by anticipatory techniques. Recent investigations proved that if the agents use selfish strategy, then in some situations sometimes the system maybe worst off with real-time data than without real-time data, even if anticipatory techniques are applied to predict the future state of the environment. This study investigates that version of the Braess paradox, where each subsequent agent of the flow may select a different route, using real-time data and anticipatory techniques. The authors contribute to the state-of-the-art by proving that the traffic distribution in this Braess paradox approximates the Nash equilibrium.

[1]  Roberto Montemanni,et al.  Design patterns from biology for distributed computing , 2006, TAAS.

[2]  Marta C. González,et al.  Understanding congested travel in urban areas , 2016, Nature Communications.

[3]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Routing without regret: on convergence to nash equilibria of regret-minimizing algorithms in routing games , 2006, PODC '06.

[4]  George F. List,et al.  Real-Time Multiple-Objective Path Search for In-Vehicle Route Guidance Systems , 1997 .

[5]  Mirko Viroli,et al.  Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: a complete overview , 2012, Natural Computing.

[6]  László Zsolt Varga How Good Is Predictive Routing in the Online Version of the Braess Paradox? , 2016, ECAI.

[7]  László Zsolt Varga,et al.  Benefit of Online Real-Time Data in the Braess Paradox with Anticipatory Routing , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC).

[8]  F. Kluegl,et al.  Decision dynamics in a traffic scenario , 2000 .

[9]  Danny Weyns,et al.  A Decentralized Approach for Anticipatory Vehicle Routing Using Delegate Multiagent Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Ana L. C. Bazzan,et al.  Case Studies on the Braess Paradox: Simulating Route Recommendation and Learning in Abstract and Microscopic Models , 2005 .

[11]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Multiagent systems, and the search for appropriate foundations , 2013, AAMAS.

[12]  Tom De Wolf,et al.  Design Patterns for Decentralised Coordination in Self-organising Emergent Systems , 2006, ESOA.

[13]  Franco Zambonelli,et al.  Injecting Self-Organisation into Pervasive Service Ecosystems , 2012, Mobile Networks and Applications.

[14]  J. G. Wardrop,et al.  Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research , 1952 .

[15]  László Zsolt Varga On Intention-Propagation-Based Prediction in Autonomously Self-adapting Navigation , 2015 .