Challenge of Ukrainian academic librarians in an evolving scholarly publishing landscape

[1]  J. Huisman.  Higher education institutions , 2000 .

[2]  Lidiya Kavunenko,et al.  Comparative analysis of journals on social sciences and humanities in Ukraine and the world , 2006, Scientometrics.

[3]  M. Haigh.  Two steps forward, one step back: Ideological and historical aspects of library and information science education in independent Ukraine , 2009 .

[4]  I. Yegorov.  Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine , 2009 .

[5]  Simon Ellis,et al.  Global Library Statistics , 2009 .

[6]  S. Benz.  Ukrainian Libraries of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: Impressions From an American Fulbright Librarian , 2009 .

[7]  Susan Benz Mls.  Ukrainian Libraries of Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow: Impressions From an American Fulbright Librarian , 2009 .

[8]  Lin Wu,et al.  Sustaining Librarian Vitality: Embedded Librarianship Model for Health Sciences Libraries , 2013, Medical reference services quarterly.

[9]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[10]  Myroslava Hladchenko,et al.  Establishing research universities in Ukrainian higher education: the incomplete journey of a structural reform , 2016 .

[11]  H. Dobson.  Think.Check.Submit.: the campaign helping researchers navigate the scholarly communication landscape , 2016 .

[12]  J Beall,et al.  Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. , 2016, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[13]  G. Vogel.  Thousands of German researchers set to lose access to Elsevier journals , 2016 .

[14]  Niala Dwarika-Bhagat.  LibGuides: Predatory Publishing: Perspectives: CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING PREDATORY OPEN-ACCESS PUBLISHERS , 2016 .

[15]  M. Balehegn.  Increased Publication in Predatory Journals by Developing Countries' Institutions: What It Entails? And What Can Be Done? , 2017 .

[16]  Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Caution with the continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access publishing lists , 2017 .

[17]  Xin Bi,et al.  Quality open access publishing and registration to Directory of Open Access Journals , 2017 .

[18]  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” lists must not be used: they are biased, flawed, opaque and inaccurate , 2017 .

[19]  Emergence of Predatory Publishing in Library and Information Science: Issues and Implications for Scholarship among Academic Librarians in Nigeria , 2017 .

[20]  D. Moher,et al.  Stop this waste of people, animals and money , 2017, Nature.

[21]  Aceil Al-Khatib,et al.  Challenges Facing the DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) as a Reliable Source of Open Access Publishing Venues , 2018 .

[22]  Serhat Kurt,et al.  Why do authors publish in predatory journals? , 2018, Learn. Publ..

[23]  J. A. T. Silva,et al.  What Value Do Journal Whitelists and Blacklists Have in Academia? , 2018, The Journal of Academic Librarianship.

[24]  J. A. T. Silva.  The illicit and illegitimate continued use of Jeffrey Beall’s “predatory” open access black lists , 2018 .

[25]  Serhii Nazarovets,et al.  Local Journals and Misleading Metrics: a Quantitative Analysis of Publication Activity of LIS Postgraduate Students in Ukraine , 2018, Bilgi Dünyasi.

[26]  Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva,et al.  The Ethical and Academic Implications of the Jeffrey Beall (www.scholarlyoa.com) Blog Shutdown , 2017, Sci. Eng. Ethics.