Teacher education in CALL: teaching teachers to educate themselves

Abstract The issue of teacher education in computer assisted language learning (CALL) has been receiving an increased amount of attention in the literature over the past few years, including as the focus of a recent book (Hubbard and Levy 2006). This attention is indicative of greater recognition of the importance of CALL practitioners having sufficient grounding in CALL theory and practice, as well as knowledge of what technologies are available to them in order to be able to effectively implement CALL in their specific language learning environments. While some institutions provide such training for their teachers (e.g. Leahy 2006), the reality is that only a small proportion of people who plan to use – or are already using – technologies in language learning contexts have access to this training; for the majority, the burden of learning how to best use CALL in the classroom falls upon the teachers themselves. This paper describes a procedure through which teachers may educate themselves regarding how to introduce CALL into their given language learning contexts. Teachers of English at a private university in Japan were given a two-hour seminar at the beginning of the semester outlining the considerations to be kept in mind when introducing technology into their learning environment. Data collected during and at the end of the semester reveal teachers’ reflections on the procedure as well as on their own efforts to use technology for the first time. The results are discussed in terms of the challenges encountered by teachers in educating themselves to use CALL and the factors affecting their success.

[1]  Jeong-Bae Son,et al.  Teacher development in e-learning environments , 2004 .

[2]  Philip Hubbard,et al.  19. Training ourselves to train our students for CALL , 2006 .

[3]  Steve Mann,et al.  The language teacher's development , 2005, Language Teaching.

[4]  Liam Murray CALL and Web training with teacher self-empowerment: a departmental and long-term approach , 1998, Comput. Educ..

[5]  J. Cosh Peer Observation: A Reflective Model. , 1999 .

[6]  Mike Levy,et al.  REVIEW OF CALL DIMENSIONS: OPTIONS AND ISSUES IN COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING CALL Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer-Assisted Language Learning , 2007 .

[7]  Kai Hakkarainen,et al.  Networking relations of using ICT within a teacher community , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Mike Levy,et al.  Call Dimensions: Options and Issues in Computer Assisted Language Learning (ESL & Applied Linguistics Professional Series) , 2006 .

[9]  S. Bax CALL—past, present and future , 2003 .

[10]  Mike Levy,et al.  Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Context and Conceptualization , 1997 .

[11]  Luba V. Iskold Building on Success, Learning from Mistakes: Implications for the Future , 2003 .

[12]  Ruth Wajnryb Classroom observation tasks : a resource book for language teachers and trainers , 1994 .

[13]  Mike Levy,et al.  Teacher education in CALL , 2006 .

[14]  Glenn Stockwell A review of technology choice for teaching language skills and areas in the CALL literature , 2007, ReCALL.

[15]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[16]  C Leahy Introducing ICT to teachers of an institution-wide language programme: Principal considerations , 2006 .

[17]  Josephine Ryan,et al.  Integrating Technology into Teacher Education: How Online Discussion Can Be Used to Develop Informed and Critical Literacy Teachers. , 2008 .

[18]  G. Kessler,et al.  Does teachers' confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? , 2008 .

[19]  Julian Edge,et al.  Computer-mediated cooperative development: non-judgemental discourse in online environments , 2006 .