Technology, culture and persuasiveness: a study of choice-shifts in group settings

In this paper we examine the impact of technology and culture and their interaction on the process and outcomes of group decision making. The conceptual foundation for this research draws on three domains: GSS, cross-cultural and group polarization. This paper uses the theory of persuasive arguments for studying group behavior in a computer-mediated, cross-cultural setting. Our findings illustrate that group decisions are a function of the medium of communication and the cultural setting in which the decision is attempted. In addition, the protocol analysis conducted demonstrates that the process of decision making in groups varies in terms of persuasive arguments exchanged as a function of the interaction between the medium of communication and the cultural setting observed. These results have both theoretical and practical implications for GSS research.

[1]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[2]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[3]  Renee A. Meyers,et al.  Testing persuasive argument theory's predictor model: Alternative interactional accounts of group argument and influence , 1989 .

[4]  Dean G. Pruitt,et al.  Conclusions: Toward an understanding of choice shifts in group discussion. , 1971 .

[5]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[6]  Eugene Burnstein,et al.  An Analysis of Group Decisions Involving Risk ("The Risky Shift") , 1969 .

[7]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[8]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Group, sub-group and nominal group idea generation in an electronic meeting environment , 1991, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  N. Adler,et al.  The Parochial Dinosaur: Organizational Science in a Global Context , 1991 .

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[11]  D. G. Pruitt Choice shifts in group discussion: An introductory review. , 1971 .

[12]  David R. Seibold,et al.  Implications for problem‐solving groups of empirical research on ‘brainstorming’: A critical review of the literature , 1978 .

[13]  L. Hong Risky Shift and Cautious Shift: Some Direct Evidence on the Culture-Value Theory , 1978 .

[14]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Information technology support for collaborative decision making in auditing: An experimental investigation , 1996, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  J. Stoner A comparison of individual and group decisions involving risk , 1961 .

[16]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[17]  Leonard M. Jessup,et al.  The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process with an Idea-Generating Task , 1990, MIS Q..

[18]  Amiram D. Vinokur,et al.  What a person thinks upon learning he has chosen differently from others: Nice evidence for the persuasive-arguments explanation of choice shifts , 1975 .

[19]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Study of Influence in Computer-Mediated Group Decision Making , 1988, MIS Q..

[20]  J.S. Valacich,et al.  A conceptual framework of anonymity in Group Support Systems , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Culture: a fourth dimension of group support systems , 1994, CACM.

[22]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Social combination models, persuasive arguments theory, social comparison theory, and choice shift. , 1982 .

[23]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An integrated framework for the study of group decision support systems , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[25]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[26]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental Investigation , 1988, MIS Q..

[27]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Does GDSS promote more democratic decision-making?-The Singapore experiment , 1990, Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  M. Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. , 1987 .

[29]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[30]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Effects of partially shared persuasive arguments on group-induced shifts: A group-problem-solving approach. , 1974 .

[32]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  A. Vinokur,et al.  Novel argumentation and attitude change: The case of polarization following group discussion , 1978 .

[34]  David G. Myers,et al.  Group-Induced Polarization of Attitudes and Behavior , 1978 .

[35]  M. E. Shaw Group dynamics : the psychology of small group behavior , 1971 .

[36]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[37]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  National culture and group support systems: examining the situation where some people are more equal than others , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[38]  Johannes A. Zuber,et al.  Choice shift and group polarization : an analysis of the status of arguments and social decision schemes , 1992 .

[39]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.

[40]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[41]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Collective versus individual induction : recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing , 1991 .