Correlate not optional: PP sprouting and parallelism in "much less" ellipsis.

Clauses that are parallel in form and meaning show processing advantages in ellipsis and coordination structures (Frazier et al. 1984; Kehler 2000; Carlson 2002). However, the constructions that have been used to show a parallelism advantage do not always require a strong semantic relationship between clauses. We present two eye tracking while reading studies on focus-sensitive coordination structures, an understudied form of ellipsis which requires the generation of a contextually salient semantic relation or scale between conjuncts. However, when the remnant of ellipsis lacks an overt correlate in the matrix clause and must be "sprouted" in the ellipsis site, the relation between clauses is simplified to entailment. Instead of facilitation for sentences with an entailment relation between clauses, our online processing results suggest that violating Parallelism is costly, even when doing so could ease the semantic relations required for interpretation.

[1]  Laurence R. Horn,et al.  On the semantic properties of logical operators in english' reproduced by the indiana university lin , 1972 .

[2]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Shallow Processing and Underspecification , 2006 .

[3]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Focus Identification during Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication the Blockinsyntax-discourse Blockindivide: Processing Blockinellipsis , 2022 .

[5]  Andrew Weir,et al.  Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis , 2014 .

[6]  D. Bishop,et al.  Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature , 2011, Cognition.

[7]  A. Papafragou,et al.  Children's Computation of Implicatures , 2004 .

[8]  A. Thallaj,et al.  Guess what? , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  Mats Rooth.  A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[10]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Verb phrase ellipsis: form, meaning, and processing , 1993 .

[11]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Conjunction meaning can modulate parallelism facilitation: Eye-tracking evidence from German clausal coordination , 2014 .

[12]  S. Hulsey,et al.  Focus Sensitive Coordination , 2008 .

[13]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[14]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[15]  G. McKoon,et al.  A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands , 1991 .

[16]  Andrea E. Martin.  Memory Operations and Structures in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Ellipsis. , 2010 .

[17]  K. Paterson,et al.  Processing contextual and lexical cues to focus: Evidence from eye movements in reading , 2013 .

[18]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[19]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Alternatives on Demand and Locality: Resolving Discourse-Linked Wh-Phrases in Sluiced Structures , 2019, Grammatical Approaches to Language Processing.

[20]  N. Katsos,et al.  Scalar implicature : theory , processing and acquisition , 2022 .

[21]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[22]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Zero-Adjective contrast in much-less ellipsis: the advantage for parallel syntax , 2018, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[23]  B. McElree,et al.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[24]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Ad-hoc scalar implicature in adults and children , 2011, CogSci.

[25]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α , 2001 .

[26]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Structural economy in the processing and representation Of gapping sentences , 2005 .

[27]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[28]  Josée Poirier,et al.  The Real-Time Processing of Sluiced Sentences , 2010, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[29]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Comprehension of Sluiced Sentences. , 1998 .

[30]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The psycholinguistics of ellipsis , 2014 .

[31]  Don C. Mitchell,et al.  Accounting for regressive eye-movements in models of sentence processing: A reappraisal of the Selective Reanalysis hypothesis , 2008 .

[32]  Kyle Johnson.  Variable island repair under ellipsis , 2001 .

[33]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[34]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[35]  Frank Keller,et al.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination , 2010 .

[36]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Regression-contingent analyses: A reply to Altmann , 1994 .

[37]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  How prosody constrains comprehension: A limited effect of prosodic packaging. , 2009, Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale.

[38]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[39]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in “let alone” ellipsis , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Processing Ellipsis : A Processing Solution to the Undergeneration Problem ? * , 2008 .

[41]  Michael Frazier,et al.  Pseudo Noun Phrase Coordination , 2012 .

[42]  Bert Cappelle,et al.  An afterthought on let alone , 2015 .

[43]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Implicit Arguments in Sentence Processing , 1995 .

[44]  Michael Walsh Dickey,et al.  Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing , 2011 .

[45]  L P Shapiro,et al.  On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[46]  A. Garnham,et al.  Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context , 1992 .

[47]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Ellipsis and higher-order unification , 1991 .

[48]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist , 2018, Language and speech.

[49]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  A theory of scalar implicature , 1985 .

[50]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  R. Viertl.  On the Future of Data Analysis , 2002 .

[52]  Jesse A. Harris.  Structure Modulates Similarity-Based Interference in Sluicing: An Eye Tracking study , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[53]  Craige Roberts.  Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[54]  Anikó Lipták,et al.  Contrast and Island Sensitivity in Clausal Ellipsis , 2014 .

[55]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[56]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  W. Dixon.  Simplified Estimation from Censored Normal Samples , 1960 .

[58]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects , 2007, Cognition.

[60]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Remarks on sluicing , 2011, Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar.

[61]  Andrew Kehler,et al.  Coherence and the Resolution of Ellipsis , 2000 .

[62]  Karl G. D. Bailey,et al.  Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .

[63]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[64]  Maziar Toosarvandani,et al.  Association with Foci , 2010 .

[65]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[66]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Comprehension of Deep and Surface Verbphrase Anaphors , 1990 .

[67]  Shoichi Danny Takahashi Fox.  MaxElide and the Re-binding Problem , 2005 .

[68]  Katy Carlson,et al.  The Role of Only in Contrasts In and Out of Context , 2013, Discourse processes.

[69]  V. Hacquard,et al.  Embedding epistemic modals in English: A corpus-based study , 2012 .

[70]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[71]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  COHERENCE AND THE RESOLUTION OF ELLIPSIS , 2015 .

[72]  G. Murphy.  Processes of understanding anaphora , 1985 .

[73]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  Jesse A. Harris.  Processing let alone coordination in silent reading , 2016 .

[75]  K Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Gapping Structures , 2001, Language and speech.

[76]  B. McElree,et al.  A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis , 2008 .

[77]  Gary Thoms,et al.  On the Non-existence ofNon-constituent Coordination and Non-constituent Ellipsis , 2014 .

[78]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[79]  Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck,et al.  The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects , 2010 .