Non-linguistic auditory processing in stuttering: evidence from behavior and event-related brain potentials.

UNLABELLED Auditory processing deficits are hypothesized to play a role in the disorder of stuttering (e.g. Hall, J. W., & Jerger, J. (1978). Central auditory function in stutterers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21, 324-337). The current study focused on non-linguistic auditory processing without verbal responses to explore the relationship between behavior and neural activity in the absence of cognitive demands related to language processing and articulatory planning for speaking. A pure-tone, oddball paradigm was utilized to compare behavioral accuracy and reaction times for adults who stutter (AWS) and normally fluent speakers (NFS). Additionally, event-related potentials elicited by brief standard and target tones were compared for the two groups. Results revealed that, as a group, AWS tended to perform less accurately compared to the NFS and were slower to respond to target stimuli. However, inspection of individual data indicated that most of the AWS performed within the range of normally fluent speakers while a small subset of AWS were well outside the normal range. This subgroup of AWS also demonstrated early perceptual processes (as indexed by N100 and P200 amplitudes) indicative of reduced cortical representation of auditory input. The P300 mean amplitudes elicited in AWS tended to be reduced overall compared to those of the NFS, suggesting the possibility of weaker updates in working memory for representations of the target tone stimuli in AWS. Taken together, these findings point to the possibility that a subset of AWS exhibit non-linguistic auditory processing deficits related to altered cortical processing. EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES After reading this article, the reader will be able to: (1) summarize research findings of non-linguistic auditory processing in stuttering; (2) discuss the relationship between behavioral performance for auditory processing and the underlying event-related brain potentials; (3) discuss the importance of analyses of individual versus group data in stuttering; and (4) summarize how the findings of this study relate to a multifactorial model of stuttering.

[1]  Christine Weber-Fox,et al.  Atypical neural functions underlying phonological processing and silent rehearsal in children who stutter. , 2008, Developmental science.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Dorman,et al.  Some observations on auditory function and stuttering , 1982 .

[4]  L. Jäncke,et al.  Functional organization of the auditory cortex is different in stutterers and fluent speakers , 1998, Neuroreport.

[5]  C. Weber-Fox.  Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Richard F. Curlee,et al.  Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions , 1991 .

[8]  V. Gracco,et al.  Effects of Alterations in Auditory Feedback and Speech Rate on Stuttering Frequency , 1993, Language and speech.

[9]  T. Nakada,et al.  A Review of EEG and Blood Flow Data , 1998, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[10]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[11]  O. Bloodstein.  A handbook on stuttering , 1969 .

[12]  P. Nunez,et al.  Neocortical Dynamics and Human EEG Rhythms , 1995 .

[13]  Walter H. Manning,et al.  Clinical Decision Making in Fluency Disorders , 2000 .

[14]  B. Guitar,et al.  A comparison of stutterers and nonstutterers on masking level differences and synthetic sentence identification tasks. , 1987, Journal of communication disorders.

[15]  G. Riley.  A stuttering severity instrument for children and adults. , 1972, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[16]  I. Blood,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses of stutterers and nonstutterers during speech production , 1990 .

[17]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Stuttering: a brief review. , 1998, American family physician.

[18]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Right rolandic activation during speech perception in stutterers: a MEG study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[20]  Ray Johnson,et al.  Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications , 1990 .

[21]  H. Neville,et al.  Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: An ERP study , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Cranford,et al.  P300 event-related potentials in stutterers and nonstutterers. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[23]  I. Blood,et al.  Central Auditory Function in Young Stutterers , 1984, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  S. Stager.  Heterogeneity in stuttering: Results from auditory brainstem response testing , 1990 .

[25]  H. Neville,et al.  The Neurobiology of Sensory and Language Processing in Language-Impaired Children , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Guitar.  Stuttering: An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment , 1998 .

[27]  J. Polich.  Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. , 1990, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  Amanda E Hampton,et al.  Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  S. W. Howe,et al.  Brainstem auditory electrical response characteristics of stutterers and nonstutterers: A preliminary report , 1982 .

[30]  C. Weber-Fox,et al.  Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.