The use of wind fields in a land use regression model to predict air pollution concentrations for health exposure studies

Abstract A methodology is developed to include wind flow effects in land use regression (LUR) models for predicting nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations for health exposure studies. NO2 is widely used in health studies as an indicator of traffic-generated air pollution in urban areas. Incorporation of high-resolution interpolated observed wind direction from a network of 38 weather stations in a LUR model improved NO2 concentration estimates in densely populated, high traffic and industrial/business areas in Toronto-Hamilton urban airshed (THUA) of Ontario, Canada. These small-area variations in air pollution concentrations that are probably more important for health exposure studies may not be detected by sparse continuous air pollution monitoring network or conventional interpolation methods. Observed wind fields were also compared with wind fields generated by Global Environmental Multiscale-High resolution Model Application Project (GEM-HiMAP) to explore the feasibility of using regional weather forecasting model simulated wind fields in LUR models when observed data are either sparse or not available. While GEM-HiMAP predicted wind fields well at large scales, it was unable to resolve wind flow patterns at smaller scales. These results suggest caution and careful evaluation of regional weather forecasting model simulated wind fields before incorporating into human exposure models for health studies. This study has demonstrated that wind fields may be integrated into the land use regression framework. Such integration has a discernable influence on both the overall model prediction and perhaps more importantly for health effects assessment on the relative spatial distribution of traffic pollution throughout the THUA. Methodology developed in this study may be applied in other large urban areas across the world.

[1]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Establishing an air pollution monitoring network for intra-urban population exposure assessment: A location-allocation approach , 2005 .

[2]  C. Willmott ON THE VALIDATION OF MODELS , 1981 .

[3]  David M. Holland,et al.  Variations of NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations downwind of a Los Angeles freeway , 1981 .

[4]  David Briggs,et al.  The Role of Gis: Coping With Space (And Time) in Air Pollution Exposure Assessment , 2005, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[5]  William R. Goodin,et al.  An Objective Analysis Technique for Constructing Three-Dimensional Urban-Scale Wind Fields , 1980 .

[6]  P. Elliott,et al.  A regression-based method for mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Nelson L. Seaman,et al.  Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments , 2000 .

[8]  A. Staniforth,et al.  The Operational CMC–MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) Model. Part I: Design Considerations and Formulation , 1998 .

[9]  Wendell A. Nuss,et al.  Use of Multiquadric Interpolation for Meteorological Objective Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  M. Jerrett,et al.  Modeling the Intraurban Variability of Ambient Traffic Pollution in Toronto, Canada , 2007, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[11]  Kiros Berhane,et al.  Bayesian modeling of air pollution health effects with missing exposure data. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  Kenneth J. Westrick,et al.  Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts , 2002 .

[13]  David M Stieb,et al.  Ambient nitrogen dioxide and distance from a major highway. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  COMPARISON OF MULTIQUADRIC SURFACES FOR THE ESTIMATION OF AREAL RAINFALL , 1974 .