Towards Innovation Excellence: Why and How to Measure Innovation Performance?

To maintain competitive advantage, today organizations need to be able to innovate - not just occasionally, but consistently. Mastering the process of innovation requires identifying the factors that support or hamper the achievement of innovations. The success of such process usually depends on the quality of the best opportunity identified, which is not enough. So, a systematic research and delivery framework spawning a set of performance measurements and improvement metrics is required, because, what is not measurable cannot be neither managed nor improved. This paper identifies three complementary components specifically developed to enable such measurement. First, Innovation Granularity Scales enabling highly targeted yet flexible performance analysis ranging from knowledge assessment to high level progressions and improvements; Second, Innovation Capability Stages referring to the minimum capabilities required by transformational milestones along the innovation continuum; Third, Innovation Maturity Levels representing the quality, predictability and performance within the innovation stages. This paper explores these complementary components and presents them as a systematic model underlying a specified innovation performance measurement framework.

[1]  R. Wolfe ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[2]  Rachida Ajhoun,et al.  Semantic Representation of Innovation, Generic Ontology for Idea Management , 2014 .

[3]  L. Bassiti Toward an Innovation Management Framework: A Life-Cycle Model with an Idea Management Focus , 2013 .

[4]  Christen Rose-Anderssen,et al.  New Product Development as a Complex Adaptive System of Decisions , 2006 .

[5]  P. Schyns,et al.  Concept learning , 1998 .

[6]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  Expert Support Systems for New Product Development Decision Making: A Modeling Framework and Applications , 1995 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[8]  L. Louw,et al.  A framework for managing the innovation process , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[9]  A. Muller,et al.  Metrics for innovations: Guidelines for developing a customized suite of innovation metrics , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[10]  Michael E. McGrath,et al.  The R&D effectiveness index: A metric for product development performance , 1994 .

[11]  Clemente Minonne,et al.  Business Process Management—Are You Ready for the Future? , 2012 .

[12]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Metrics: you are what you measure! , 1998 .

[13]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Knowledge Visualization , 2011, Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management.

[14]  M. Behlol,et al.  Concept of Learning , 2010 .

[15]  J. Bessant,et al.  Innovation Management Measurement: A Review , 2006 .

[16]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain , 1979 .

[17]  Marcos Paulo Valadares de Oliveira,et al.  Supply chain maturity and performance in Brazil , 2008 .

[18]  Marta Indulska,et al.  European Conference on Information Systems ( ECIS ) 5-15-2012 IDEA ASSESSMENT IN OPEN INNOVATION : A STATE OF PRACTICE , 2017 .

[19]  Friedrich Kerka,et al.  Evaluating innovation ideas: a comprehensive approach to New Product Development , 2009 .

[20]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[21]  C. Eden,et al.  The theory and praxis of reflective learning in strategy making , 1998 .

[22]  Diana P. Hoyt The Innovation Master Plan: The CEO's Guide to Innovation, Volume 2 , 2012 .

[23]  Robert A. Simons The role of management control systems in creating competitive advantage: New perspectives☆ , 1990 .