What Makes Creative Teams Tick? Cohesion, Engagement, and Performance Across Creativity Tasks: A Three-Wave Study

The present study examines the mediational role of collective engagement in the relationship between team cohesion and team creative performance. A reciprocal process was expected to unfold across creativity task episodes: (a) team cohesion leads to collective task engagement, which in turn has a positive effect on team creative performance (perceived team performance and independently rated creativity), and (b) perceived team creative performance predicts the development of future team cohesion. The study relied on a longitudinal three-wave research design through an organizational simulation exercise, in which 118 project teams (605 individuals) were charged with three creativity tasks. This study advances collective task engagement as an important mediational process explaining team performance in creative activities.

[1]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  A. Tsui,et al.  A SOCIAL-STRUCTURAL PERSPECTIVE ON EMPLOYEE- ORGANIZATION RELATIONSHIPS AND TEAM CREATIVITY , 2014 .

[4]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[5]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members' competence. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[7]  A. Somech,et al.  Translating Team Creativity to Innovation Implementation , 2013 .

[8]  A. Bandura,et al.  Impact of Adolescents' Filial Self‐Efficacy on Quality of Family Functioning and Satisfaction , 2005 .

[9]  Ed Calmull.  How Pixar Fosters Collective Creativity , 2008 .

[10]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  S. Hobfoll.  The Influence of Culture, Community, and the Nested-Self in the Stress Process: Advancing Conservation of Resources Theory , 2001 .

[12]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[13]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[15]  Dong-Sung Cho,et al.  Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation , 2011 .

[16]  Lindred L. Greer.  Group Cohesion , 2012 .

[17]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  From causes to conditions in group research , 2012 .

[18]  A. Bandura.  Exercise of Human Agency Through Collective Efficacy , 2000 .

[19]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[20]  A. Bakker,et al.  Team work engagement: A model of emergence , 2014 .

[21]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[22]  Abhijeet K. Vadera,et al.  Win or Lose the Battle for Creativity: The Power and Perils of Intergroup Competition , 2010 .

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  M. Petty,et al.  Team-Member Exchange Under Team and Traditional Management , 1995 .

[25]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Perceived Collective Efficacy, Subjective Well-Being And Task Performance Among Electronic Work Groups , 2003 .

[26]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Transformational leadership and team innovation: integrating team climate principles. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[27]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[28]  H. Marsh,et al.  An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. , 1996 .

[29]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  W. Lyddon.  Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity" , 1998 .

[31]  Amy E. Randel,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Teams , 2014 .

[32]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[33]  J. L. Price.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[34]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity , 1991 .

[35]  D. Beal,et al.  Cohesion and performance in groups: a meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  How Does Corporate Ethics Contribute to Firm Financial Performance? , 2013 .

[37]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity , 2011, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[38]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[39]  Dennis O’Connor,et al.  Team Leadership , 2007 .

[40]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model of burnout. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[42]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[43]  E. Deci,et al.  The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[45]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[46]  Maja O’Connor.  LONGITUDINAL STUDY , 2013 .

[47]  Narda R. Quigley,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Team Conflict, Conflict Management, Cohesion, and Team Effectiveness , 2009 .

[48]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Links in the chain of adversity following job loss: how financial strain and loss of personal control lead to depression, impaired functioning, and poor health. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[49]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[50]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[51]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[52]  J. Peiró,et al.  Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediation of service climate. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[53]  Subin Im,et al.  Spurring Cross‐Functional Integration for Higher New Product Performance: A Group Effectiveness Perspective* , 2010 .

[54]  Bernard A. Nijstad,et al.  Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects , 2012 .

[55]  Despoina Xanthopoulou,et al.  Creativity and charisma among female leaders: the role of resources and work engagement , 2013 .

[56]  Jing Zhou.  Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. , 1998 .

[57]  Michael Christian,et al.  WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[58]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources , 2009 .

[59]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[60]  Robert R. Hirschfeld,et al.  Mental efficacy and physical efficacy at the team level: inputs and outcomes among newly formed action teams. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  Race against the machine : how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy , 2011 .

[63]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[64]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  An Examination of the Relative Impact of Normative Information and Self‐Efficacy on Personal Goals and Performance Over Time1 , 1992 .

[65]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[66]  N. Anderson,et al.  Innovation and Creativity in Organizations , 2014 .

[67]  Jin Nam Choi,et al.  Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams , 2012 .

[68]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[69]  E. Hatfield,et al.  Emotional Contagion , 1995 .

[70]  K. Daniels,et al.  Utilizing job resources: Qualitative evidence of the roles of job control and social support in problem solving , 2013 .

[71]  J. L. Price,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[72]  Jing Zhou,et al.  When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  Ji Hoon Song,et al.  Team Creativity: The Effects of Perceived Learning Culture, Developmental Feedback and Team Cohesion , 2012 .

[74]  P. Bliese.  Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[75]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[76]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[77]  S. Taggar.  Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[78]  M. Ziessler,et al.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[79]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[80]  D. Harrison,et al.  TIES, LEADERS, AND TIME IN TEAMS: STRONG INFERENCE ABOUT NETWORK STRUCTURE'S EFFECTS ON TEAM VIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[81]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[82]  I. H. van Emmerik,et al.  Deep-Level Similarity and Group Social Capital: Associations With Team Functioning , 2009 .

[83]  Shimul Melwani,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[84]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Substantive and operational issues of response bias across levels of analysis: an example of climate-satisfaction relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[85]  Ramesh K. Agarwal,et al.  A MODEL OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2011 .

[86]  Daniel J. Svyantek,et al.  Person–Organization Fit and Contextual Performance: Do Shared Values Matter☆☆☆ , 1999 .