Characterization of corresponding microcalcification clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis: comparison of classifiers

We are developing an automated system for analysis of microcalcification clusters on serial mammograms. Our automated system consists of two stages: (1) automatic registration of corresponding clusters on temporal pairs of mammograms producing true (TP-TP) and false (TP-FP) pairs; and (2) characterization of temporal pairs of clusters as malignant and benign using a temporal classifier. In this study, we focussed on the design of the temporal classifier. Morphological and texture (RLS and GLDS) features are automatically extracted from the detected current and prior cluster locations. Additionally, difference morphological and RLS features are obtained. The automatically detected cluster locations on the temporal pairs may deviate from the optimal locations as selected by expert radiologists. This will introduce "noise" to the extracted features and make the classification task more difficult. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and support vector machine (SVM) classifiers were trained to classify the true and false pairs. Leaveone-case-out resampling method was used for feature selection and classifier design. In this study, 175 serial mammogram pairs containing biopsy-proven microcalcification clusters were used. At the first stage of the system, 85% (149/175) of the TP-TP pairs were identified with 15 false matches within the 164 image pairs that had computerdetected clusters on the priors. At the second stage, an average of 7 features were selected (4 difference morphological, 1 difference RLS and 2 current GLDS). The LDA and SVM temporal classifiers achieved test Az of 0.83 and 0.82, respectively, for the classification of the 164 cluster temporal pairs as malignant or benign. In comparison, an MQSA radiologist achieved an Az of 0.72. Both the LDA and SVM classifiers were able to classify the automatically detected temporal pairs of microcalcification clusters with accuracy comparable to that of an experienced radiologist.

[1]  M. Kallergi Computer-aided diagnosis of mammographic microcalcification clusters. , 2004, Medical physics.

[2]  R E Hendrick,et al.  American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[5]  Elizabeth S Burnside,et al.  Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  K L Lam,et al.  Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. , 1998, Medical physics.

[8]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  A study on several Machine-learning methods for classification of Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  R. Nishikawa,et al.  The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification. , 2003, Medical physics.

[10]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 2004, Radiology.

[11]  R M Nishikawa,et al.  Dependence of computer classification of clustered microcalcifications on the correct detection of microcalcifications. , 2001, Medical physics.

[12]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[14]  B. Cady,et al.  The life‐sparing potential of mammographic screening , 2001, Cancer.

[15]  L W Bassett,et al.  Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  S. Fields,et al.  Computerized evaluation of mammographic lesions: what diagnostic role does the shape of the individual microcalcifications play compared with the geometry of the cluster? , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Laura M. Yarusso,et al.  Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance. , 2004, Medical physics.

[18]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of malignant and benign microcalcification clusters based on the analysis of temporal change of mammographic features , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.