Coupled Multibody/Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Maneuvering Flexible Aircraft

This paper illustrates the application of multibody system dynamics coupled to computational fluid dynamics for the aeroelastic analysis of detailed aircraftmodels performing arbitrary free flightmotion. An efficient alternative to modeling different aspects of aeromechanics in a monolithic code consists in building computational aeroservoelasticity modeling capability using independent software components for each domain: structure, fluid and mechanism analysis. This partitioned approach relies on dedicated software exploiting the most appropriate techniques to address the dynamics of each specific field. Efficiency is guaranteed since each subsystem can be modeled independently; specific time and spatial scales of interest are considered. Model setup is flexible: the designer can choose the most appropriate tools, trading accuracy for computational costs, requiring higher-order fidelity methods only when simplified ones cannot be applied, or their validation is pursued. The combination of multibody system dynamics and computational fluid dynamics yields a highly accurate prediction tool, that can be crucial in the preliminary and intermediate design steps of unconventional configurations, for the investigation of loads, performance, stability and vibratory response of the vehicle at the boundaries of the flight envelope. Its application to the analysis of an aircraft maneuvering in transonic flight is presented.

[1]  Shia Hui Peng.  HYBRID RANS-LES MODELING BASED ON ZERO- AND ONE-EQUATION MODELS FOR TURBULENT FLOW SIMULATION , 2005 .

[2]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree , 1995, Adv. Comput. Math..

[3]  Simon Wiedemann,et al.  Simulation of Deployment of a Flexible Solar Array , 2002 .

[4]  Paolo Mantegazza,et al.  State Space Reduced Order Models for Static Aeroelasticity and Flight Mechanics of Flexible Aircrafts , 2003 .

[5]  A. Huerta,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems , 2003 .

[6]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Application of Navier-Stokes simulations for aeroelastic stability assessment in transonic regime , 2007 .

[7]  Andrew Arena,et al.  Application of the transpiration method for aeroservoelastic prediction using CFD , 1998 .

[8]  Robert Schaback,et al.  Remarks on Meshless Local Construction of Surfaces , 2000, IMA Conference on the Mathematics of Surfaces.

[9]  Martin Spieck,et al.  Aeroelastic Effects in Multibody Dynamics , 2004 .

[10]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Introduction to dynamics and control , 1985 .

[11]  W. P. Rodden,et al.  Equations of motion of a quasisteady flight vehicle utilizing restrained static aeroelastic characteristics , 1985 .

[12]  O. Pironneau.  Finite Element Methods for Fluids , 1990 .

[13]  H. Ashley.  Observations on the dynamic behavior of large flexible bodies in orbit. , 1967 .

[14]  Simon Wiedemann,et al.  Comparison of Results in Flexible Multibody Dynamics Using Various Approaches , 2003 .

[15]  Giuseppe Quaranta,et al.  Further Results of Soft-Inplane Tiltrotor Aeromechanics Investigation Using Two Multibody Analyses , 2004 .

[16]  Russell M. Cummings,et al.  Comparisons of computational fluid dynamics solutions of static and manoeuvring fighter aircraft with flight test data , 2009 .

[17]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Flexible Flight Vehicles , 2001 .

[18]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Application of deformable-body mean axis to flexible multibody system dynamics , 1986 .

[19]  Oddvar O. Bendiksen,et al.  Transonic Limit Cycle Flutter/LCO , 2004 .

[20]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Nonlinear Design Loads for Maneuvering Elastic Aircraft , 2000 .

[21]  Eric Charlton.  COMPUTATIONAL AEROELASTICITY IN HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT FLIGHT LOADS , 2000 .

[22]  Luca Cavagna,et al.  NeoCASS: An integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level , 2010 .

[23]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  A semi-torsional spring analogy model for updating unstructured meshes in 3D moving domains , 2005 .

[24]  O. Wallrapp.  Flexible Bodies in Multibody System Codes , 1998 .

[25]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  CFD-Based Gust Response Analysis of Free Elastic Aircraft , 2009 .

[26]  Roberto Gil Annes da Silva,et al.  Navier-Stokes-Based Study into Linearity in Transonic Flow for Flutter Analysis , 2003 .

[27]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Flight dynamics of aeroelastic vehicles , 1988 .

[28]  Bernard Etkin,et al.  Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight , 1972 .

[29]  Robert E. Bartels,et al.  Finite Macro-Element Mesh Deformation in a Structured Multi-Block Navier-Stokes Code , 2013 .

[30]  F. Krogh,et al.  Solving Ordinary Differential Equations , 2019, Programming for Computations - Python.

[31]  Oskar Wallrapp,et al.  Standardization of flexible body modeling in multibody system codes , 1994 .

[32]  W. P. Jennings,et al.  Effect of Stabilizer Dihedral and Static Lift on T-Tail Flutter , 1977 .

[33]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Multibody Implementation of Finite Volume C-0 Beams , 2000 .

[34]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Multidisciplinary Simulation of the Maneuvering of an Aircraft , 2001, Engineering with Computers.

[35]  E C Yates,et al.  AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response I - Wing 445.6 , 1988 .

[36]  Norman S. Land,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Mach Number, Stabilizer Dihedral, and Fin Torsional Stiffness on the Transonic Flutter Characteristics of a Tee-Tail , 1961 .

[37]  R. D. Milne.  Dynamics of the deformable aeroplane , 1964 .

[38]  Andrew Arena,et al.  CFD-based aeroservoelastic predictions with comparisons to benchmark experimental data , 1999 .

[39]  Peng Shia-Hui.  Hybrid RANS-LES modelling based on zero- and one-equation models for turbulent flow simulation , 2005 .

[40]  Dewey H. Hodges,et al.  Flight Dynamics of Highly Flexible Flying Wings , 2006 .

[41]  Thomas A. Zeiler,et al.  Nonlinear simulation of a flexible aircraft in maneuvering flight , 1987 .

[42]  Jan Nordström,et al.  Investigations of Acceleration Effects on Misssile Aerodynamics Using CFD , 2003 .

[43]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Simulation and Choice of Shape Functions , 1999 .

[44]  P. Thomas,et al.  Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids , 1979 .

[45]  Dario H. Baldelli,et al.  Unified Aeroelastic and Flight Dynamic Formulation via Rational Function Approximations , 2006 .

[46]  Michael Henshaw,et al.  Comparison of static and dynamic fluid-structure interaction solutions in the case of a highly flexible modern transport aircraft wing , 2003 .

[47]  Ahmed A. Shabana,et al.  Flexible Multibody Dynamics: Review of Past and Recent Developments , 1997 .

[48]  A. Huerta,et al.  Finite Element Methods for Flow Problems , 2003 .

[49]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[50]  D. Henningson,et al.  Shape Optimization for Delay of Laminar-Turbulent Transition , 2006 .

[51]  Daniella E. Raveh,et al.  Maneuver Load Analysis of Overdetermined Trim Systems , 2008 .

[52]  Martin Spieck,et al.  Multibody Simulation of the Free-Flying Elastic Aircraft , 2005 .

[53]  Mark,et al.  Application of CFD/CSD to Rotor Aeroelastic Stability in Forward Flight , 2010 .

[54]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations : a parallel approach , 1995 .

[55]  Lars Tysell.  Adaptive grid generation for 3D unstructured grids , 2010 .

[56]  H. Bijl,et al.  Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolation , 2007 .

[57]  P. Likins,et al.  Floating reference frames for flexible spacecraft , 1977 .

[58]  R. D. Milne,et al.  Some remarks on the dynamics of deformable bodies. , 1968 .

[59]  A. Arena,et al.  On the transpiration method for efficient aeroelastic analysis using an Euler solver , 1996 .

[60]  Leonard Meirovitch,et al.  Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates , 1991 .

[61]  E. Carson Yates,et al.  AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response , 1989 .

[62]  Jens Neumann,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Maneuvering Aircraft by Aerodynamic, Flight Mechanics and Structural Mechanics Coupling , 2007 .

[63]  P. Lancaster,et al.  Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods , 1981 .

[64]  Werner Schiehlen,et al.  Multibody System Dynamics: Roots and Perspectives , 1997 .