Accuracy, precision, and reliability of chemical measurements in natural products research.

Natural products chemistry is the discipline that lies at the heart of modern pharmacognosy. The field encompasses qualitative and quantitative analytical tools that range from spectroscopy and spectrometry to chromatography. Among other things, modern research on crude botanicals is engaged in the discovery of the phytochemical constituents necessary for therapeutic efficacy, including the synergistic effects of components of complex mixtures in the botanical matrix. In the phytomedicine field, these botanicals and their contained mixtures are considered the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), and pharmacognosists are increasingly called upon to supplement their molecular discovery work by assisting in the development and utilization of analytical tools for assessing the quality and safety of these products. Unlike single-chemical entity APIs, botanical raw materials and their derived products are highly variable because their chemistry and morphology depend on the genotypic and phenotypic variation, geographical origin and weather exposure, harvesting practices, and processing conditions of the source material. Unless controlled, this inherent variability in the raw material stream can result in inconsistent finished products that are under-potent, over-potent, and/or contaminated. Over the decades, natural product chemists have routinely developed quantitative analytical methods for phytochemicals of interest. Quantitative methods for the determination of product quality bear the weight of regulatory scrutiny. These methods must be accurate, precise, and reproducible. Accordingly, this review discusses the principles of accuracy (relationship between experimental and true value), precision (distribution of data values), and reliability in the quantitation of phytochemicals in natural products.

[1]  S. Lazarus,et al.  Identification of procyanidins and anthocyanins in blueberries and cranberries (Vaccinium spp.) using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2001, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[2]  D. Pustaka,et al.  Guidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for dietary supplements and botanicals , 2005 .

[3]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Harmonized guidelines for single-laboratory validation of methods of analysis (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2002 .

[4]  L. A. Currie,et al.  Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995) , 1995 .

[5]  P. Cunniff Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International , 2019 .

[6]  Lloyd A. Currie,et al.  DETECTION : INTERNATIONAL UPDATE, AND SOME EMERGING DI-LEMMAS INVOLVING CALIBRATION, THE BLANK, AND MULTIPLE DETECTION DECISIONS , 1997 .

[7]  M. Roman Determination of ephedrine alkaloids in botanicals and dietary supplements by HPLC-UV: collaborative study. , 2004, Journal of AOAC International.

[8]  W. May,et al.  An Approach to the Metrologically Sound Traceable Assessment of the Chemical Purity of Organic Reference Materials | NIST , 2004 .

[9]  Deepali Chavan,et al.  Analytical Method Development and Validation , 2012 .

[10]  R. Plackett,et al.  THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 1946 .

[11]  J. J. Williaman,et al.  Alkaloid-bearing plants and their contained alkaloids , 1961 .

[12]  S. Musser,et al.  Determination of ephedrine-type alkaloids in dietary supplements by LC/MS using a stable-isotope labeled internal standard. , 2001, Journal of AOAC International.

[13]  J. Abraham The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[14]  B. Portz,et al.  Chiral gas chromatographic determination of ephedrine-type alkaloids in dietary supplements containing Má Huáng. , 1997, Journal of AOAC International.

[15]  W. Evans Trease and Evans' Pharmacognosy , 1989 .

[16]  D. Charlet,et al.  New observations on the secondary chemistry of world Ephedra (Ephedraceae). , 2001, American journal of botany.