Assessing and minimizing the effects of noise and motion in clinical DTI at 3 T

Compared with conventional MRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is more prone to thermal noise and motion. Optimized sampling schemes have been proposed that reduce the propagation of noise. At 3 T, however, motion may play a more dominant role than noise. Although the effects of noise at 3 T are less compared with 1.5 T because of the higher signal‐to‐noise ratio, motion is independent of field strength and will persist. To improve the reliability of clinical DTI at 3 T, it is important to know to what extent noise and motion contribute to the uncertainties of the DTI indices. In this study, the effects of noise‐ and motion‐related signal uncertainties are disentangled using in vivo measurements and computer simulations. For six clinically standard available sampling schemes, the reproducibility was assessed in vivo, with and without motion correction applied. Additionally, motion and noise simulations were performed to determine the relative contributions of motion and noise to the uncertainties of the mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA). It is shown that the contributions of noise and motion are of the same order of magnitude at 3 T. Similar to the propagation of noise, the propagation of motion‐related signal perturbations is also influenced by the choice of sampling scheme. Sampling schemes with only six diffusion directions demonstrated a lower reproducibility compared with schemes with 15 and 32 directions and feature a positive bias for the FA in relatively isotropic tissue. Motion correction helps improving the precision and accuracy of DTI indices. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: A Monte Carlo study † , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Computation of the fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity maps without tensor decoding and diagonalization: Theoretical analysis and validation , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Reinhard Dengler,et al.  Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: New Developments in Diagnostic Markers , 2006, Neurodegenerative Diseases.

[5]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Ronald R. Peeters,et al.  Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  P. Kingsley,et al.  Introduction to diffusion tensor imaging mathematics: Part III. Tensor calculation, noise, simulations, and optimization , 2006 .

[9]  Luis Concha,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of time-dependent axonal and myelin degradation after corpus callosotomy in epilepsy patients , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Effects of signal‐to‐noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging–derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Meng Law,et al.  Applications of Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Bin Chen,et al.  Correction for direction-dependent distortions in diffusion tensor imaging using matched magnetic field maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  D L Parker,et al.  Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion‐tensor MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  P. Basser,et al.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain. , 1996, Radiology.

[16]  R. Della Nave,et al.  Whole-Brain Histogram and Voxel-Based Analyses of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Patients with Leukoaraiosis: Correlation with Motor and Cognitive Impairment , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging , 2006, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[18]  M. Maier Quantitative MRI of the brain—measuring changes caused by disease , 2004 .

[19]  David H. Miller,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis by nuclear magnetic resonance , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  C. Pierpaoli,et al.  Brain parenchyma apparent diffusion coefficient alterations associated with experimental complex partial status epilepticus. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  P. Basser,et al.  A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[22]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[23]  Debashis Kushary,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  G. Glover,et al.  4698591 Method for magnetic field gradient eddy current compensation , 1988 .

[25]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  P. Tofts Quantitative MRI of the Brain , 2003 .

[27]  S Ekholm,et al.  Effects of number of diffusion gradient directions on derived diffusion tensor imaging indices in human brain. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  P. Basser,et al.  Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion‐weighted MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: intraindividual comparative study. , 2005, Radiology.

[30]  M. Horsfield,et al.  Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  S Skare,et al.  Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[32]  N. Papadakis,et al.  Minimal gradient encoding for robust estimation of diffusion anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging at low SNR: nonmonotonic behaviors of tensor contrasts. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[35]  S. Skare,et al.  Noise considerations in the determination of diffusion tensor anisotropy. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[36]  Michael E. Moseley,et al.  Longitudinal changes in white matter following ischemic stroke: A three-year follow-up study , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[37]  John D Carew,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[38]  Menelaos Malamas,et al.  Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity measurements on normal human brain: comparison between low- and high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging sequences , 2005, European Radiology.

[39]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[40]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Effects of diffusion weighting schemes on the reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T , 2007, NeuroImage.

[41]  D. Kendall Random Variables and Probability Distributions (3Rd Ed.) , 1971 .

[42]  D. Altman,et al.  Measurement error. , 1996, BMJ.

[43]  Klaas Nicolay,et al.  Reproducibility of Quantitative Cerebral T2 Relaxometry, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and 1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3.0 Tesla , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[44]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion‐weighted MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[45]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[46]  N G Papadakis,et al.  A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[47]  R. Henkelman Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[48]  Tong Zhu,et al.  An optimized wild bootstrap method for evaluation of measurement uncertainties of DTI-derived parameters in human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[49]  Christian Beaulieu,et al.  Voxel based versus region of interest analysis in diffusion tensor imaging of neurodevelopment , 2007, NeuroImage.

[50]  W. Edelstein,et al.  A signal-to-noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems. , 1984, Medical physics.

[51]  Geoff J. M. Parker,et al.  Characterizing function–structure relationships in the human visual system with functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[52]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  A. Connelly,et al.  Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[54]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in acute stroke. , 2005, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[55]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.