Simultaneous estimation and segmentation from projection data in dynamic PET

PURPOSE Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) is known for its ability to extract spatiotemporal information of a radio tracer in living tissue. Information of different functional regions based on an accurate reconstruction of the activity images and kinetic parametric images has been widely studied and can be useful in research and clinical setting for diagnosis and other quantitative tasks. In this paper, our purpose is to present a novel framework for estimating the kinetic parametric images directly from the raw measurement data together with a simultaneous segmentation accomplished through kinetic parameters clustering. METHOD An iterative framework is proposed to estimate the kinetic parameter image, activity map and do the segmentation simultaneously from the complete dynamic PET projection data. The clustering process is applied to the kinetic parameter variable rather than to the traditional activity distribution so as to achieve accurate discrimination between different functional areas. Prior information such as total variation regularization is incorporated to reduce the noise in the PET images and a sparseness constraint is integrated to guarantee the solution for kinetic parameters due to the over complete dictionary. Alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) method is used to solve the optimization problem. The proposed algorithm was validated with experiments on Monte Carlo-simulated phantoms and real patient data. Symbol error rate (SER) was defined to evaluate the performance of clustering. Bias and variance of the reconstruction activity images were calculated based on ground truth. Relative mean square error (MSE) was used to evaluate parametric results quantitatively. RESULT In brain phantom experiment, when counting rate is 1 × 106 , the bias (variance) of our method is 0.1270 (0.0281), which is lower than maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) 0.1637 (0.0410) and direct estimation without segmentation (DE) 0.1511 (0.0326). In the Zubal phantom experiment, our method has the lowest bias (variance) 0.1559 (0.0354) with 1 × 105 counting rate, compared with DE 0.1820 (0.0435) and MLEM 0.3043 (0.0644). As for classification, the SER of our method is 18.87% which is the lowest among MLEM + k-means, DE + k-means, and kinetic spectral clustering (KSC). Brain data with MR reference and real patient results also show that the proposed method can get images with clear structure by visual inspection. CONCLUSION In this paper, we presented a joint reconstruction framework for simultaneously estimating the activity distribution, parametric images, and parameter-based segmentation of the ROIs into different functional areas. Total variation regularization is performed on the activity distribution domain to suppress noise and preserve the edges between ROIs. An over complete dictionary for time activity curve basis is constructed. SER, bias, variance, and MSE were calculated to show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Lorenzo Rosasco,et al.  Iterative Projection Methods for Structured Sparsity Regularization , 2009 .

[2]  Donald L. Snyder,et al.  Parameter Estimation for Dynamic Studies in Emission-Tomography Systems Having List-Mode Data , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Joint estimation of dynamic PET images and temporal basis functions using fully 4D ML-EM , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  B. Mercier,et al.  A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation , 1976 .

[5]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Direct 4-D PET List Mode Parametric Reconstruction With a Novel EM Algorithm , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Segmentation of mouse dynamic PET images using a multiphase level set method , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. Vidal,et al.  Sparse Subspace Clustering: Algorithm, Theory, and Applications. , 2013, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence.

[8]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Patlak Image Estimation From Dual Time-Point List-Mode PET Data , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Direct Parametric Image Reconstruction in Reduced Parameter Space for Rapid Multi-Tracer PET Imaging , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[11]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Direct Estimation of Kinetic Parametric Images for Dynamic PET , 2013, Theranostics.

[12]  D. Barber The use of principal components in the quantitative analysis of gamma camera dynamic studies. , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M. Escobar,et al.  Markov Chain Sampling Methods for Dirichlet Process Mixture Models , 2000 .

[14]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Whole-body direct 4D parametric PET imaging employing nested generalized Patlak expectation–maximization reconstruction , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Martin A Lodge,et al.  Dynamic whole-body PET parametric imaging: I. Concept, acquisition protocol optimization and clinical application , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET. , 2007, PET clinics.

[17]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  Introduction to the Dirichlet Distribution and Related Processes , 2010 .

[18]  Yee Whye Teh,et al.  Sharing Clusters among Related Groups: Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes , 2004, NIPS.

[19]  J. Borwein,et al.  Two-Point Step Size Gradient Methods , 1988 .

[20]  Liu Hua Performance Evaluation of the HAMAMATSU SHR22000 Whole-Body PET Scanner Using the IEC Standard , 2006 .

[21]  Ghassan Hamarneh,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation, Kinetic Parameter Estimation, and Uncertainty Visualization of Dynamic PET Images , 2007, MICCAI.

[22]  L. Shepp,et al.  A Statistical Model for Positron Emission Tomography , 1985 .

[23]  Yin Zhang,et al.  User’s Guide for TVAL3: TV Minimization by Augmented Lagrangian and Alternating Direction Algorithms , 2010 .

[24]  E. Reiman,et al.  Clustering huge data sets for parametric PET imaging. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[25]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Generalized Algorithms for Direct Reconstruction of Parametric Images From Dynamic PET Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[27]  Claus Svarer,et al.  Cluster analysis in kinetic modelling of the brain: a noninvasive alternative to arterial sampling , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Fahrig,et al.  Simultaneous segmentation and reconstruction: a level set method approach for limited view computed tomography. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  D.M. Mount,et al.  An Efficient k-Means Clustering Algorithm: Analysis and Implementation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  Roger N Gunn,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Compartmental Models: A Basis Pursuit Strategy for Kinetic Modeling , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[31]  Pengcheng Shi,et al.  Tracer Kinetics Guided Dynamic PET Reconstruction , 2007, IPMI.

[32]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  The role of quantitative (18)F-FDG PET studies for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  U Ruotsalainen,et al.  Joint penalized-likelihood reconstruction of time-activity curves and regions-of-interest from projection data in brain PET. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  Georg Schramm,et al.  On the relation between Kaiser-Bessel blob and tube of response based modelling of the system matrix in iterative PET image reconstruction. , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Variational Segmentation of Vector-Valued Images With Gradient Vector Flow , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[37]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  BrainWeb: Online Interface to a 3D MRI Simulated Brain Database , 1997 .

[38]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm , 2001, NIPS.

[39]  Thomas K Lewellen,et al.  18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  S. Gunn,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography Compartmental Models , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[41]  William W. Hager,et al.  A Nonmonotone Line Search Technique and Its Application to Unconstrained Optimization , 2004, SIAM J. Optim..

[42]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Tracer Kinetic Modeling in PET , 2005 .

[43]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[44]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Sparsity Constrained Mixture Modeling for the Estimation of Kinetic Parameters in Dynamic PET , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[45]  Quanzheng Li,et al.  Direct reconstruction of cardiac PET kinetic parametric images using a preconditioned conjugate gradient approach. , 2013, Medical physics.

[46]  Wufan Chen,et al.  3.5D dynamic PET image reconstruction incorporating kinetics-based clusters , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  S Stute,et al.  Segmentation of dynamic PET images with kinetic spectral clustering , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Guobao Wang,et al.  An Optimization Transfer Algorithm for Nonlinear Parametric Image Reconstruction From Dynamic PET Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[50]  Soo-Jin Lee,et al.  Incorporating Anatomical Side Information Into PET Reconstruction Using Nonlocal Regularization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[51]  Ken D. Sauer,et al.  Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.