WIT: A wireless integrated traffic model

Simulation is a common approach for designing ad hoc network applications, due to the slow deployment of these networks. The main building blocks of ad hoc network applications are the routing protocols, mobility, and traffic models. Several studies, which use synthetic models, show that mobility and traffic have a significant effect on protocol performance. Synthetic models do not realistically reflect the environment where the ad hoc networks will be deployed. In addition, mobility and traffic tools are designed independently of each other, however real trace data challenge that assumption. Indeed, recent protocol performance evaluation using real testbeds show that performance evaluations under real testbeds and simulations that use synthetic models differ significantly. In this paper we consider jointly both real mobility and traffic for protocol performance evaluation. The contributions of this work are as follows: (1) demonstrates that real mobility and traffic are interconnected; (2) announces the design and implementation of WIT -Wireless Integrated Traffic-, which includes the design of a real traffic generator; (3) shows that under real mobility and integrated traffic the performance metrics need to be re-thought, thus we propose availability as a new ad hoc network protocol performance metric; and, finally, (4) evaluates protocol performance under synthetic and real mobility models with integrated traffic. We believe that the results of our work constitute a step forward toward benchmarking of ad hoc network performance evaluations.

[1]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[2]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  A nonstationary Poisson view of Internet traffic , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[3]  A. Winsor Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[4]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[5]  Jeff Boleng,et al.  Metrics to Enable Adaptive Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2002 .

[6]  Averill M. Law,et al.  How to build valid and credible simulation models , 2008, 2008 Winter Simulation Conference.

[7]  S. Wittevrongel,et al.  Queueing Systems , 2019, Introduction to Stochastic Processes and Simulation.

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[9]  Nj Piscataway,et al.  Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications , 1996 .

[10]  R. Butterworth,et al.  Queueing Systems, Vol. II: Computer Applications. , 1977 .

[11]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[12]  Per Gunningberg,et al.  Evaluating wireless multi-hop networks using a combination of simulation, emulation, and real world experiments , 2007, MobiEval '07.

[13]  David Kotz,et al.  Extracting a Mobility Model from Real User Traces , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[14]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A call to arms: it's time for REAL mobility models , 2008, MOCO.

[15]  Songwu Lu,et al.  Characterizing flows in large wireless data networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[16]  Mario Gerla,et al.  From battlefields to urban grids: New research challenges in ad hoc wireless networks , 2005, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[17]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  Weighted waypoint mobility model and its impact on ad hoc networks , 2005, MOCO.

[18]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[19]  Jitendra Padhye,et al.  Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks , 2004, SIGCOMM 2004.

[20]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Advances in network simulation , 2000, Computer.

[21]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.