Comparison of a multiplex, bead-based fluorescent assay and immunofluorescence methods for the detection of ANA and ANCA autoantibodies in human serum.

Detection of antinuclear (ANA) and antineutrophil cytoplasmic (ANCA) antibodies is extensively used for establishing a diagnosis in patients with clinical features suggestive of autoimmune disorders. The most common methods for the identification of positive patients' sera for ANA or ANCA are indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and ELISA-based procedures. Considerable effort has been made in developing simpler automated assays for routine laboratory use. Recently a commercially available microsphere-based fluorescent assay has been introduced for the detection of ANA and ANCA. The aim of this study was to compare this technology with routinely used IIF and ELISA procedures, in patients with a suggested autoimmune disorder. A highly significant correlation between ELISA procedures for specific antibodies and the microsphere-based assays were obtained for both ANA and ANCA as well as for extractable nuclear antigens ELISA screening, indicating that multiplex technology could replace individual ELISA tests for the measurement of specific autoantibodies. However, a low sensitivity for identifying IIF-positive cases was obtained for both ANA (58.0%) and ANCA (59.1%), although there was a significant correlation between the assays. In conclusion, our data show that a microsphere-based fluorescent assay may be a valid platform for the simultaneous determination of circulating individual ANA and ANCA autoantibodies. Furthermore, multiplexing technology offers several advantages that will probably make it an attractive tool in the future. Nevertheless, until further studies are conducted that determine the clinical performance of the multiplex technology, the initial screening of patients for autoantibodies with IIF is still considered necessary.

[1]  J. Varga,et al.  Information on diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus derived from the routine measurement of 8 nuclear autoantibodies. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  A. Wiik,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a capture ELISA for detection of proteinase-3 antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. , 1998, Kidney international.

[3]  J. Koziol,et al.  A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. III. Comparative performance characteristics of academic and manufacturers' laboratories. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  T. Jaskowski,et al.  Screening for antinuclear antibodies by enzyme immunoassay. , 1996, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  J. Skosey,et al.  Clinical value of an integrated ELISA system for the detection of 6 autoantibodies (ssDNA, dsDNA, Sm, RNP/Sm, SSA, and SSB). , 1990, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  S. Targan,et al.  A distinct subset of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies is associated with inflammatory bowel disease. , 1990, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[7]  J. W. Pickering,et al.  Comparison of a Multiplex Flow Cytometric Assay with Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Quantitation of Antibodies to Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Haemophilus influenzae Type b , 2002, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[8]  F. Breedveld,et al.  Autoantibodies to neutrophil cytoplasmic enzymes in Felty's syndrome. , 1993, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[9]  J. Piette,et al.  Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in 566 European patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence, clinical associations and correlation with other autoantibodies , 1998 .

[10]  D. Vignali,et al.  Simultaneous quantitation of 15 cytokines using a multiplexed flow cytometric assay. , 1999, Journal of immunological methods.

[11]  J. Savige,et al.  Anti‐neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis , 1991, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[12]  J. Savige,et al.  Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated systemic vasculitis after immunisation with bacterial proteins. , 2002, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[13]  W. Kuis,et al.  Simultaneous Detection of 15 Human Cytokines in a Single Sample of Stimulated Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells , 2003, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[14]  Harry R. Hill,et al.  Evaluation of Multiplexed Fluorescent Microsphere Immunoassay for Detection of Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[15]  J. Savige,et al.  What do antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) tell us? , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[16]  Y. Shoenfeld,et al.  Multiplexed AtheNA multi-lyte immunoassay for ANA screening in autoimmune diseases , 2005, Autoimmunity.

[17]  A Kavanaugh,et al.  Guidelines for clinical use of the antinuclear antibody test and tests for specific autoantibodies to nuclear antigens. American College of Pathologists. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[18]  S. Adelstein,et al.  Autoantibodies to Extractable Nuclear Antigens: Making Detection and Interpretation More Meaningful , 2002, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[19]  Viswanath Devanarayan,et al.  Development, validation, and implementation of a multiplex immunoassay for the simultaneous determination of five cytokines in human serum. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  J. Savige,et al.  Immunofluorescent patterns produced by antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) vary depending on neutrophil substrate and conjugate , 2002, Journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  J. Savige,et al.  Diagnostic value of classical and atypical antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) immunofluorescence patterns. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[22]  J. P. McCoy,et al.  Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: Comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers , 2004, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[23]  R. Borrow,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Tetraplex Flow Cytometric Assay for Quantitation of Serum Antibodies to Neisseria meningitidis Serogroups A, C, Y, and W-135 , 2004, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[24]  E. Stanford,et al.  Development and validation of a nonaplex assay for the simultaneous quantitation of antibodies to nine Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes. , 2005, Journal of immunological methods.

[25]  T. H. The,et al.  AUTOANTIBODIES AGAINST NEUTROPHILS AND MONOCYTES: TOOL FOR DIAGNOSIS AND MARKER OF DISEASE ACTIVITY IN WEGENER'S GRANULOMATOSIS , 1985, The Lancet.

[26]  J. Koziol,et al.  Range of antinuclear antibodies in "healthy" individuals. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[27]  S. Targan,et al.  Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies combined with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in inflammatory bowel disease: prevalence and diagnostic role , 1998, Gut.

[28]  S. Dunbar,et al.  Quantitative, multiplexed detection of bacterial pathogens: DNA and protein applications of the Luminex LabMAP system. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[29]  S. Targan,et al.  Segregation of pANCA antigenic recognition by DNase treatment of neutrophils: Ulcerative colitis, type 1 autoimmune hepatitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis , 1995, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[30]  L. Mély,et al.  Flow Cytometric Microsphere-Based Immunoassay: Analysis of Secreted Cytokines in Whole-Blood Samples from Asthmatics , 2001, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[31]  J. Montgomery,et al.  DETECTION OF CRYPTOSPORIDIUM ANTIBODIES IN SERA AND ORAL FLUIDS USING MULTIPLEX BEAD ASSAY* , 2004, The Journal of parasitology.

[32]  Insoo Kang,et al.  Utility of age, gender, ANA titer and pattern as predictors of anti-ENA and -dsDNA antibodies , 2004, Clinical Rheumatology.

[33]  G. Hoffman,et al.  Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. , 1998, Bulletin on the rheumatic diseases.

[34]  Ulvestad,et al.  Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Antinuclear Antibodies in Rheumatological Practice , 2000, Scandinavian journal of immunology.