A new oil/membrane approach for integrated sweat sampling and sensing: sample volumes reduced from μL's to nL's and reduction of analyte contamination from skin.

Wearable sweat biosensensing technology has dominantly relied on techniques which place planar-sensors or fluid-capture materials directly onto the skin surface. This 'on-skin' approach can result in sample volumes in the μL regime, due to the roughness of skin and/or due to the presence of hair. Not only does this increase the required sampling time to 10's of minutes or more, but it also increases the time that sweat spends on skin and therefore increases the amount of analyte contamination coming from the skin surface. Reported here is a first demonstration of a new paradigm in sweat sampling and sensing, where sample volumes are reduced from the μL's to nL's regime, and where analyte contamination from skin is reduced or even eliminated. A micro-porous membrane is constructed such that it is porous to sweat only. To complete a working device, first placed onto skin is a cosmetic-grade oil, secondly this membrane, and thirdly the sensors. As a result, spreading of sweat is isolated to only regions above the sweat glands before it reaches the sensors. Best case sampling intervals are on the order of several minutes, and the majority of hydrophilic (low oil solubility) contaminants from the skin surface are blocked. In vitro validation of this new approach is performed with an improved artificial skin including human hair. In vivo tests show strikingly consistent results, and reveal that the oil/membrane is robust enough to even allow horizontal sliding of a sensor.

[1]  Jason Heikenfeld,et al.  Non‐invasive Analyte Access and Sensing through Eccrine Sweat: Challenges and Outlook circa 2016 , 2016 .

[2]  K. Sato,et al.  A modified anaerobic method of sweat collection. , 1984, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[3]  M D Luque de Castro,et al.  Sweat: a sample with limited present applications and promising future in metabolomics. , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[4]  S. Derler,et al.  Tribology of Skin: Review and Analysis of Experimental Results for the Friction Coefficient of Human Skin , 2011, Tribology Letters.

[5]  J Heikenfeld,et al.  The microfluidics of the eccrine sweat gland, including biomarker partitioning, transport, and biosensing implications. , 2015, Biomicrofluidics.

[6]  Dermot Diamond,et al.  A wearable electrochemical sensor for the real-time measurement of sweat sodium concentration , 2010 .

[7]  Nancy Kelley-Loughnane,et al.  Adhesive RFID Sensor Patch for Monitoring of Sweat Electrolytes , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Sam Emaminejad,et al.  Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis , 2016, Nature.

[9]  J. Windmiller,et al.  Electrochemical tattoo biosensors for real-time noninvasive lactate monitoring in human perspiration. , 2013, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  G TASHIRO,et al.  A bromphenol blue method for visualizing sweat at the openings of the sweat ducts. , 1961, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[11]  J. Weaver,et al.  Comparison of the effects of short, high-voltage and long, medium-voltage pulses on skin electrical and transport properties. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[12]  Ian Papautsky,et al.  Artificial microfluidic skin for in vitro perspiration simulation and testing. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Xian Huang,et al.  Stretchable, wireless sensors and functional substrates for epidermal characterization of sweat. , 2014, Small.