Validity and reliability of a dietary assessment method: the application of a digital camera with a mobile phone card attachment.

This study was aimed at evaluation of the validity and reliability of an alternative dietary measurement method that assists epidemiologic studies. We validated a handheld personal digital assistant with camera and mobile phone card, called Wellnavi, in which a 1-d weighed diet record was employed as a reference method. Twenty college students majoring in food and nutrition participated in this study. They were asked to keep a diet record and to take digital photos of all these recorded food at the same time, then send them to the dietitians by the mobile phone card. In the reliability study, other twenty students from the same college were asked to take digital photos of the same meal during a day by two same instruments under the same circumstances and to send these photos to the different dietitians electronically. With respect to validity, median nutrient intakes estimated by the Wellnavi method and the diet record method are comparable. Correlation coefficients between the median nutrient intakes estimated from these two methods ranged from 0.46 for monounsaturated fatty acid to 0.93 for vitamin B12 and copper (median r = 0.77). With respect to reliability, our data show a good agreement between two Wellnavi instruments for most of the nutrients. Correlation coefficients between the nutrient intakes estimated from 2 instruments ranged from 0.55 for vitamin B1 and water-insoluble dietary fiber to 0.92 for vitamin B12 (median r = 0.78). In conclusion, the results indicate this dietary assessment instrument can usefully measure individual dietary intakes for a variety of nutrients in an epidemiologic study.

[1]  G R Howe,et al.  Evaluation of a diet history questionnaire for epidemiologic studies. , 1980, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  G R Howe,et al.  Evaluation of a self-administered dietary questionnaire for use in a cohort study. , 1982, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[3]  D H Calloway,et al.  Food intake measurement: problems and approaches. , 1983, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  W. Willett,et al.  Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire: comparison with a 1-year diet record. , 1987, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  J. Palmgren,et al.  Reproducibility and validity of dietary assessment instruments. I. A self-administered food use questionnaire with a portion size picture booklet. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  M. Nelson,et al.  A computerized diet questionnaire for use in diet health education , 1991, British Journal of Nutrition.

[7]  M. Nelson,et al.  Food Photography I: the perception of food portion size from photographs , 1994, British Journal of Nutrition.

[8]  G. Beaton,et al.  Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology. , 1994, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[9]  I M Buzzard,et al.  Research priorities and recommendations for dietary assessment methodology. First International Conference on Dietary Assessment Methods. , 1994, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[10]  E Riboli,et al.  The Malmö Food Study: validity of two dietary assessment methods for measuring nutrient intake. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Walter C. Willett Overview of Nutritional Epidemiology , 1998 .

[12]  [Inter-observer agreement and validity of photographic dietary assessment]. , 2002, [Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health.