Accuracy of inhomogeneity correction in photon radiotherapy from CT scans with different settings.

We report an investigation on the accuracy of inhomogeneity correction in photon radiotherapy from CT scans with different settings. Specifically, the dosimetric differences from different CT scan parameters (kV, mAs) to phantoms and from different Hounsfield unit versus electron density (HU-ED) curves to patients are investigated. The absolute dose per monitor units (dose/MU) is used to quantify the results. We found that only for high-density bones (cranium, femoral tube, etc) using small field 18 MV beams, the dose/MU is up to 2% higher for CT scans using 80 kV than for 130 kV at a depth just beyond the bone and is up to 1-1.5% higher for CT scans using 80 mAs than for 300 mAs. For low-density bones (such as femoral head) and lung, the difference is 1% or less with different kV or mAs settings. The dose/MU varies with different HU-ED curves by up to 2%. The HU-ED curve from the stochiometric calibration was found to be more accurate based on a real measurement. A simplified 4-point curve provides nearly the same accuracy as the stochiometric calibration and may be used as an alternative for routine clinical application.

[1]  S Webb,et al.  A cone-beam megavoltage CT scanner for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M. G. Lötter,et al.  Comparison of the Batho, ETAR and Monte Carlo dose calculation methods in CT based patient models. , 2001, Medical physics.

[4]  C. Chui,et al.  Experimental verification of a CT-based Monte Carlo dose-calculation method in heterogeneous phantoms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[5]  R. Jeraj,et al.  The effect of dose calculation accuracy on inverse treatment planning. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Michael J. Bronskill,et al.  Compton scatter imaging of transverse sections: an overall appraisal and evaluation for radiotherapy planning , 1981 .

[7]  T. Mackie,et al.  Megavoltage CT on a tomotherapy system. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  A. Ahnesjö.  Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media. , 1989, Medical physics.

[9]  S. Cora,et al.  Photon dose calculation of a three-dimensional treatment planning system compared to the Monte Carlo code BEAM. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  H Guan,et al.  Feasibility of megavoltage portal CT using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and a multi-level scheme algebraic reconstruction technique (MLS-ART) , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  T. Holmes,et al.  Acceptance testing computerized radiation therapy treatment planning systems: direct utilization of CT scan data. , 1985, Medical physics.

[12]  M. G. Lötter,et al.  The indirect use of CT numbers to establish material properties needed for Monte Carlo calculation of dose distributions in patients. , 1998, Medical physics.

[13]  P. Metcalfe,et al.  Verification of lung dose in an anthropomorphic phantom calculated by the collapsed cone convolution method. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.