On the relevance of locus equations for production and perception of stop consonants

We examined the possible relevance of locus equations to human production and perception of stop consonants. The orderly output constraint (OOC) of Sussman, Frachter, and Cable (1995) claims that humans have evolved to produce speech such thatF2 at consonant release andF2 at vowel midpoint are linearly related for consonants so that developing perceptual systems can form representations in anF2ons-by-F2vowel space. The theory claims that this relationship described by locus equations can distinguish consonants, and that the linearity of locus equations is captured in neural representations and is thus perceptually relevant. We investigated these claims by testing how closely locus equations reflect the production and perception of stop consonants. In Experiment 1, we induced speakers to change their locus equation slope and intercept parameters systematically, but found that consonants remained distinctive in slope-by-intercept space. In Experiment 2, we presented stop-consonant syllables with their bursts removed to listeners, and compared their classification error matrices with the predictions of a model using locus equation prototypes and with those of an exemplar-based model that usesF2ons andF2vowel, but not locus equations. Both models failed to account for a large proportion of the variance in listeners’ responses; the locus equation model was no better in its predictions than the exemplar model. These findings are discussed in the context of the OOC.

[1]  C. Fowler Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  Acoustic Loci and Transitional Cues for Consonants , 1954 .

[3]  Walter B. Weimer,et al.  Cognition and the symbolic processes , 1974 .

[4]  D. Massaro Speech Perception By Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry , 1989 .

[5]  R. Bladon,et al.  Coarticulation resistance in English /l/ , 1976 .

[6]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[7]  R. Hetu,et al.  Non-acoustic environmental factor influences on occupational hearing impairment: a preliminary discussion paper , 1987 .

[8]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Stop-consonant recognition: Release bursts and formant transitions as functionally equivalent, context-dependent cues , 1977 .

[9]  D Krull,et al.  Relating acoustic properties to perceptual responses: a study of Swedish voiced stops. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .

[11]  H. Wagner,et al.  Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  C A Fowler,et al.  Intrinsicf0 differences in spoken and sung vowels and their perception by listeners , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  C A Fowler,et al.  Invariants, specifiers, cues: An investigation of locus equations as information for place of articulation , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  S. Öhman Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[15]  Harvey M. Sussman,et al.  Locus equations as phonetic descriptors of consonantal place of articulation , 1996 .

[16]  E. Farnetani V-C-V Lingual Coarticulation and Its Spatiotemporal Domain , 1990 .

[17]  H. Sussman,et al.  An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization , 1991 .

[18]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[19]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Humans did not evolve from bats , 1994 .

[20]  G. Kuhn On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  C. Best A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[22]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .

[23]  René Carré,et al.  Articuiltory-Acoustic-Phonetic Relations and Modeling, Regions and Modes , 1990 .

[24]  C. Fowler An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .

[25]  H M Sussman,et al.  The perceptual relevance of locus equations. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  David Fruchter Perceptual significance of locus equations , 1994 .

[27]  C A Fowler,et al.  Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  H. Sussman,et al.  A cross-linguistic investigation of locus equations as a phonetic descriptor for place of articulation. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Douglas H. Whalen,et al.  Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information , 1989 .

[30]  Harvey M. Sussman Neural coding of relational invariance in speech: human language analogs to the barn owl. , 1989 .

[31]  J. D. Amerman,et al.  A Cinefluorographic Investigation of the Coarticulatory Behaviors of the Apex and Body Lingual Articulators , 1970 .

[32]  S. F. Disner Evaluation of vowel normalization procedures. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Harvey M. Sussman,et al.  The Phonological Reality of Locus Equations across Manner Class Distinctions: Preliminary Observations , 1993 .

[34]  D H Klatt,et al.  Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[36]  H M Sussman,et al.  Locus equations derived from compensatory articulation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  A. Liberman,et al.  The role of consonant-vowel transitions in the perception of the stop and nasal consonants. , 1954 .

[38]  N. Suga,et al.  Specificity of combination-sensitive neurons for processing of complex biosonar signals in auditory cortex of the mustached bat. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  N Suga,et al.  Combination-sensitive neurons in the medial geniculate body of the mustached bat: encoding of relative velocity information. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[41]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[42]  M E Schouten,et al.  Identification of deleted consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  D. Kewley-Port Measurement of formant transitions in naturally produced stop consonant-vowel syllables. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  H. Sussman The Neurogenesis of Phonology , 1988 .

[45]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  An electropalatographic and acoustic study of consonant-to-vowel coarticulation , 1991 .

[46]  D. Recasens,et al.  Coarticulatory Patterns and Degrees of Coarticulatory Resistance in Catalan CV Sequences , 1985, Language and speech.

[47]  G. Kuhn Stop consonant place perception with single-formant stimuli: evidence for the role of the front-cavity resonance. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[49]  H M Sussman The Representation of Stop Consonants in Three-Dimensional Acoustic Space , 1991, Phonetica.

[50]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[51]  Danielle Duez Second formant locus-nucleus patterns: An investigation of spontaneouos French speech , 1992, Speech Commun..

[52]  O. Engstrand,et al.  Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.