Modeling of scale‐down effects on the hydrodynamics of expanded bed adsorption columns

Expanded‐bed adsorption (EBA) is a technique for primary recovery of proteins starting from unclarified broths. This process combines centrifugation, concentration, filtration, and initial capturing of the proteins in a single step. An expanded bed (EB) is comparable to a packed bed in terms of separation performance but its hydrodynamics are that of a fluidized bed. Downstream process development involving EBA is normally carried out in small columns to minimize time and costs. Our purpose here is to characterize the hydrodynamics of expanded beds of different diameters, to develop scaling parameters that can be reliably used to predict separation efficiency of larger EBA columns. A hydrodynamic model has been developed which takes into account the radial liquid velocity profile in the column. The scale‐down effect can be characterized in terms of apparent axial dispersion, Daxl,app, and plate number, NEB, adapted for expanded bed. The model is in good agreement with experimental results obtained from 1‐ and 5‐cm column diameters with buffer solutions of different viscosities. The model and the experiments show an increase of apparent axial dispersion with an increase in column diameter. Furthermore, the apparent axial dispersion is affected by an increase in liquid velocity and viscos‐ ity. Supported by visual observations and predictions from the model, it was concluded that operating conditions (liquid viscosity and superficial velocity) resulting in a bed‐void fraction between 0.7 and 0.75 would provide the optimal separation efficiency in terms of NEB. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 790–799, 2003.

[1]  J. Wesselingh,et al.  Batch fluidized ion-exchange column for streams containing suspended particles , 1980 .

[2]  J. Couderc,et al.  Caractéristiques hydrodynamiques de la fluidisation liquide—solide: Influence du distributeur , 1988 .

[3]  H. Chase,et al.  Expanded bed chromatography of proteins in small diameter columns. I. Scale down and validation , 2000, Bioseparation.

[4]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[5]  P. Larsson,et al.  Theories of chromatographic efficiency applied to expanded beds. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Kula,et al.  The influence of complex biological feedstock on the fluidization and bed stability in expanded bed adsorption , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  H. Chase,et al.  Facilitated downstream processing of a histidine-tagged protein from unclarified E. coli homogenates using immobilized metal affinity expanded-bed adsorption. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  D. Mccormick Expanded Bed Adsorption , 1993, Bio/Technology.

[9]  M. Jolivet,et al.  Purification of a recombinant protein expressed in yeast: optimization of analytical and preparative chromatography. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[10]  M. Kula,et al.  Hydrodynamics and performance in fluidized bed adsorption. , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Anders Axelsson,et al.  Simulation of chromatographic processes applied to separation of proteins , 1999 .

[12]  H. Chase,et al.  The effect of column verticality on separation efficiency in expanded bed adsorption. , 1999, Bioseparation.

[13]  D. Lütkemeyer,et al.  INTERACTION OF MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURE BROTH WITH ADSORBENTS IN EXPANDED BED ADSORPTION OF MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES , 1999 .

[14]  H. Chase,et al.  Development of operating conditions for protein purification using expanded bed techniques: The effect of the degree of bed expansion on adsorption performance , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.