Evolving methods for written representations of signed languages of the Deaf

Like all human languages, signed languages used in Deaf communities are analyzable according to many of the same linguistic models and constructs that are used for oral languages. The signed language linguist, however, is confronted with methodological problems stemming from the visual/corporal modality in which these languages are produced and perceived as well as the pervasive iconicity at all levels of the language. This chapter reviews some of the major methodological problems connected with the written representation of these languages, at the level of the isolated sign as well as signed texts, and then describes some newer projects and methodologies, many of which not only reflect revised theories that more accurately represent these languages but also utilize recent advances in computer and media technologies.

[1]  Roland Pfau,et al.  Nonmanuals: their grammatical and prosodic roles , 2010 .

[2]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Modelling: A Research Effort with Applications in Deaf Communication , 2009, HCI.

[3]  Isabella Chiari,et al.  The Representation Issue and its Multifaceted Aspects in Constructing Sign Language Corpora: Questions, Answers, Further Problems , 2008 .

[4]  Wendy Sandler,et al.  Sign Language and Linguistic Universals: Entering the lexicon: lexicalization, backformation, and cross-modal borrowing , 2006 .

[5]  Trevor Johnston,et al.  W(h)ither the Deaf Community? Population, Genetics, and the Future of Australian Sign Language , 2006 .

[6]  Alessio Di Renzo,et al.  Italian Sign Language ( LIS ) : can we write it and transcribe it with SignWriting ? , 2006 .

[7]  H. Rogers.  Writing Systems: A Linguistic Approach , 2004 .

[8]  M. Bono.  on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas Hanke.  HamNoSys – Representing Sign Language Data in Language Resources and Language Processing Contexts , 2004 .

[10]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages , 2003 .

[11]  O. Fischer,et al.  Introduction. From signing back to signs , 2003 .

[12]  Paola Pietrandrea,et al.  The notation of signed texts: Open questions and indications for further research , 2002 .

[13]  Christopher Miller.  Section I: Some reflections on the need for a common sign notation , 2002 .

[14]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Transcription as a tool for understanding: The Berkeley Transcription System for sign language research (BTS) , 2002 .

[15]  Sarah Florence Taub,et al.  Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language , 2001 .

[16]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. , 2000 .